[This must be a FAQ, and if so I'll put it on the wiki]
I tried to force an active hyperlink to be part of a bibliography entry.
If the bibliography style file for that entry type uses it, maybe it
will work. But I wanted to put it in the 'note' field so that I could
add it to most entries. e.
On 4/24/07, Ricard Roca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have read this thread in the mailing list
> (http://archive.contextgarden.net/message/20070413.171025.c375278f.en.html)
> and understood the problem.
See
http://archive.contextgarden.net/message/20070326.110622.842543c2.en.html
Mojca
_
I have read this thread in the mailing list
(http://archive.contextgarden.net/message/20070413.171025.c375278f.en.html)
and understood the problem.
Sorry for the noise.
Ricard
___
If your question is of interest to
On 4/23/07, Mojca Miklavec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Just to let you all know: ConTeXt with pdfTeX creates PDF version 1.5
> by default, and xdvipdfmx driver of XeTeX (which became the default
> one) isn't capable to handle those files. It handles PDF 1.4 OK, so if
> you have some PDF
Hi,
I can't use opentype font features with XeTeX, e.g. "Palatino
Linotype:+smcp" for small caps. It works with plain XeTeX or ConTeXt
with \font, e.g.
\font\PALA="Palatino Linotype:+smcp" at 12pt
\PALA some text...
but not with typescripts, like
\starttypescript[serif][PalatinoLinotype][uc]
Hello,
Just to let you all know: ConTeXt with pdfTeX creates PDF version 1.5
by default, and xdvipdfmx driver of XeTeX (which became the default
one) isn't capable to handle those files. It handles PDF 1.4 OK, so if
you have some PDFs with a too recent version, you should convert them
to a lower v
I have organised my (many!) figures in a file listing them all
(\useexternalfigure[][][width=...])
I find it very convenient to adjust the width there and not in the
\placefigure part of the single chapters. I suppose it is presently
not possible to also control the placement (inner, outer a
> Is there another macro in Context called \frac and if so how is it
> called?
I use (e)grep in this situations, it's more texnician.
luigi
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry t
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Apr 2007, Zhichu Chen wrote:
>
>
>> Hi, Aditya
>>
>> I've made another definition, the output is OK, with some errors. Can you
>> tell me what's wrong?
>>
>
> Here is a more robust solution
>
> \everypar{%
> \let\normalpar\par%
> \let\par\donothing%
> \pag
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007, Zhichu Chen wrote:
> Hi, Aditya
>
> I've made another definition, the output is OK, with some errors. Can you
> tell me what's wrong?
Here is a more robust solution
\everypar{%
\let\normalpar\par%
\let\par\donothing%
\page[yes]%
\let\par\normalpar}
or
\everypar{%
\begingro
10 matches
Mail list logo