On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 1:52 AM, Yue Wang wrote:
> Hi, Mojca.
>
> thanks for reply.
>
>
> > There is no problem to make one, but the most important question: Who
> > is going/willing to send me the binaries for the almost-latest XeTeX,
> > metapost, LuaTeX and pdfTeX? If anyone is willing to
Hi, Mojca.
thanks for reply.
> There is no problem to make one, but the most important question: Who
> is going/willing to send me the binaries for the almost-latest XeTeX,
> metapost, LuaTeX and pdfTeX? If anyone is willing to take that over
> (send me binaries for the beginning) and to test
On Wed, Mar 12 2008, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
> You probably have to download and extract a new cont-tmf, then manually
> copy scripts/context/lua/mtxrun.lua and scripts/context/lua/luatools.lua
> to (the|a) binaries directory as /mtxrun and /luatools.
>
> After that, run luatools --generate, and al
On Wednesday 12 March 2008, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
> \blank[1in]
> \hskip2.5in
> \framed
> [width=3in,align=right]
> {Sincerely yours\blank[.7in]John Doe}
THANKS,
I had tried the \framed command
but left out the KEY "align=right"
Without the "align=right"
the \blank[.7in] is ignored
and t
Peter Münster wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 12 2008, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
>> Did you fetch a new first-setup.sh ? You have to, because
>> the mtxrun commandline has changed. It should now be:
>
> No, where can I find it?
> It does not seem to be in the zips in
> http://www.pragma-ade.com/dir?path=context/
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:55:15 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Is there any recommended ConTeXt equivalent to latex's parbox command?
\framed
> Specifically I'm thinking of signature blocks such as
>
> \vspace{1in}
>\hspace{2.5in}
> \parbox{3in}{Sincerely yours,
>
Is there any recommended ConTeXt equivalent to latex's parbox command?
Specifically I'm thinking of signature blocks such as
\vspace{1in}
\hspace{2.5in}
\parbox{3in}{Sincerely yours,
\vspace{.7in}\\
John Doe}
or this:
\ne
On Wed, Mar 12 2008, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
>
> Did you fetch a new first-setup.sh ? You have to, because
> the mtxrun commandline has changed. It should now be:
No, where can I find it?
It does not seem to be in the zips in
http://www.pragma-ade.com/dir?path=context/current
> mtxrun --verbose --
Peter Münster wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 12 2008, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
>
>> Mine has disappeared last night
>
> Mine not... :(
Did you fetch a new first-setup.sh ? You have to, because
the mtxrun commandline has changed. It should now be:
mtxrun --verbose --script ./bin/mtx-update.lua --update --m
On Wed, Mar 12 2008, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> Mine has disappeared last night
Mine not... :(
Should I send another output of
MTX_INPUT_TRACE=10 luatools --ini --compile cont-en ?
Or perhaps some other informations?
> (luatex 0.25, another job for you, if that matters).
It seems, that Taco has
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 3:09 PM, Peter Münster wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Any news about this one?
> Am I the only one having this problem?
Mine has disappeared last night (luatex 0.25, another job for you, if
that matters).
Mojca
___
Hello,
Any news about this one?
Am I the only one having this problem?
Cheers, Peter
--
http://pmrb.free.fr/contact/
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillis
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 4:57 AM, Yue Wang wrote:
> thanks, mojca, but I think in the future new minimals should be
> carefully tested before commit to the server.
There are two different things:
- scripts devoted to the minimals (which is what I have updated now)
- ConTeXt itself
The reason for
http://www.pragma-ade.com/download-1.htm
It's the first time that I see a release time
< 00:00 by an epsilon
--
luigi
it's new .
it's powerful .
it's luatex .
http://www.luatex.org
___
If your question is of interes
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have applied the changes to mtx-update.lua made by Hans without
> really testing them:
>
>> hm, just copy to mtx-update
>>
>> it forces us to fix things
>
> Now you need to use --force to really do anything useful (you might
> need to update first-setup.sh/ba
Yue Wang wrote:
> thanks, mojca, but I think in the future new minimals should be
> carefully tested before commit to the server.
> at least 5 times the formats failed to compile this year which made
> the users run into problem using it.
> btw. the minimals works fine under FreeBSD using the Linux
16 matches
Mail list logo
