Re: [NTG-context] "Padding" in natural tables

2008-08-29 Thread Hans Hagen
B. Tommy Jensen wrote: > Hi,, > I have been searching the documentation on natural tables (\bTABLE), but > haven't been > able to resolve the following issue: > > I would like to specify an internal padding in the table cells, e.g. text > content should start 0.4cm > from the left edge of the

Re: [NTG-context] Font fallbacks

2008-08-29 Thread Hans Hagen
Wolfgang Schuster wrote: > Hi, > > the \definefontfallback commands use only the last setting in a comma > seperated list. fixed (it needed a deep copy of tables) - Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE

Re: [NTG-context] headers and footers

2008-08-29 Thread Alan Stone
(1) The main manual mentions (bottom of pg 78) "setting the state is done for the whole header" and (bottom of page 79) "the keys state, before and after work on all parts of the pagebody, main text, margins and edges. So there's no way to set the text/margin/edge states separately ? ( I need diff

Re: [NTG-context] headers and footers

2008-08-29 Thread Taco Hoekwater
Yue Wang wrote: > No. The example and the code do not match. should be corrected. I see it too. Almost as if Figure 3.3 and 3.4 are copies of 3.2. Best wishes, Taco ___ If your question is of interest to others as wel

Re: [NTG-context] headers and footers

2008-08-29 Thread Yue Wang
OK, today I read the chapter again and I am sure examples in pages like pp36, pp37 of cont-eni.pdf are wrong. Zoom your Adobe Reader to 600% and notice the header text. On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 6:21 PM, Taco Hoekwater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alan Stone wrote: >> Ok thanks. >> >> Next, pg 80 ta

Re: [NTG-context] headers and footers

2008-08-29 Thread Yue Wang
No. The example and the code do not match. should be corrected. On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 7:20 PM, Wolfgang Schuster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 12:38 PM, Yue Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> OK, today I read the chapter again and I am sure examples in pages >> like pp36,

Re: [NTG-context] big are big with lucida

2008-08-29 Thread Yue Wang
oh, I made a another mistake. I mean __complete__ set (not basic set) font from TUG:) On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 5:30 PM, Taco Hoekwater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Yue Wang wrote: >> This is of course Lucida Expert fonts. >> (The quality of the image is not so good, because I cannot upload

Re: [NTG-context] headers and footers

2008-08-29 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 12:38 PM, Yue Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > OK, today I read the chapter again and I am sure examples in pages > like pp36, pp37 of cont-eni.pdf are wrong. > Zoom your Adobe Reader to 600% and notice the header text. > > On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 6:21 PM, Taco Hoekwater <[

[NTG-context] Font fallbacks

2008-08-29 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Hi, the \definefontfallback commands use only the last setting in a comma seperated list. In this example only characters from 0x0071 to 0x0081 are set in bolditalic. \definefontfallback [whatever] [BoldItalic] [0x0041-0x0051,0x0071-0x0081] \definefontsynonym[SerifPlus][Serif][fallbacks=whateve

Re: [NTG-context] big are big with lucida

2008-08-29 Thread Eric DÉTREZ
Le 29 août 08 à 12:00, Yue Wang a écrit : > On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 5:58 AM, Eric DÉTREZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hello >> >> The bigl, bigr ans so on are really BIG (huge even) when used with >> lucida. >> >> I think that math-lbr is guilty : it says >> *

Re: [NTG-context] big are big with lucida

2008-08-29 Thread Yue Wang
There is one possible condition: He failed to install the math part of the lucida font (either pfbs or tfms) . and then to some unknown reasons ConTeXt switch to the Latin Modern Font. But it still use value like 8.20 (defined in math-lbr) instead of 0.85 (defined in plain TeX, core-mat and ma

Re: [NTG-context] big are big with lucida

2008-08-29 Thread Taco Hoekwater
Yue Wang wrote: > On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 5:31 PM, Yue Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> OK, I will re sent the pdf tonight. >> > s/sent/send/g Thank you. Now I no longer understand why Eric got wrong output :( > btw, Taco, the attachment restriction (40k) is too stirct... I do not think we can

Re: [NTG-context] headers and footers

2008-08-29 Thread Taco Hoekwater
Alan Stone wrote: > Ok thanks. > > Next, pg 80 table 4.5, result column > > state result > -- > none invisible, no whitespace > empty one page invisible, whitespace > highone page visible, no whitespace > stop

Re: [NTG-context] big are big with lucida

2008-08-29 Thread Hans Hagen
Taco Hoekwater wrote: > Yue Wang wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 5:31 PM, Yue Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> OK, I will re sent the pdf tonight. >>> >> s/sent/send/g > > Thank you. Now I no longer understand why Eric got wrong output :( > >> btw, Taco, the attachment restriction (40k) is t

Re: [NTG-context] headers and footers

2008-08-29 Thread Alan Stone
Ok thanks. Next, pg 80 table 4.5, result column state result -- none invisible, no whitespace empty one page invisible, whitespace highone page visible, no whitespace stopinvisible, whitespace What does this

Re: [NTG-context] big are big with lucida

2008-08-29 Thread Yue Wang
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 5:58 AM, Eric DÉTREZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello > > The bigl, bigr ans so on are really BIG (huge even) when used with > lucida. > > I think that math-lbr is guilty : it says > ** > \def\LBRbig {\@@dobig{8.20}} > \def\LBRBig

Re: [NTG-context] big are big with lucida

2008-08-29 Thread Taco Hoekwater
Hi, Yue Wang wrote: > This is of course Lucida Expert fonts. > (The quality of the image is not so good, because I cannot upload > large attachments. that's it.) What does your typescript look like? Lucida Expert may not be the same as the Lucida Bright fonts from TUG (previously YandY). Best w

Re: [NTG-context] big are big with lucida

2008-08-29 Thread Yue Wang
OK, I will re sent the pdf tonight. On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 4:43 PM, Wolfgang Schuster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 10:23 AM, Taco Hoekwater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Wolfgang Schuster wrote: >>> On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 8:50 AM, Eric DÉTREZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >

[NTG-context] scite and lm

2008-08-29 Thread Hans Hagen
Hi, in the minimals there is a ttf file: .../texmf-context/fonts/truetype/hoekwater/lm/LMTypewriter10-Regular.ttf you can copy that file to c:\Windows\Fonts then in in context.properties you can set if PLAT_WIN font.monospace=font:LMTypewriter10-Regular,size:14 font.errorfont=font:LM

Re: [NTG-context] big are big with lucida

2008-08-29 Thread Yue Wang
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 5:31 PM, Yue Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > OK, I will re sent the pdf tonight. > s/sent/send/g btw, Taco, the attachment restriction (40k) is too stirct... t.pdf Description: Adobe PDF document t.tex Description: TeX document _

Re: [NTG-context] vertical position of framed sucks!

2008-08-29 Thread Steffen Wolfrum
Am 29.08.2008 um 11:18 schrieb Peter Rolf: > Steffen Wolfrum schrieb: >> Hi, >> >> sorry for my foggy post last night (02:50h ...) >> >> Hopefully this example makes it clearer: >> -- >> >> \starttext >> \showframe >> >> \definehead[EbeneFuenf][subsubsubsection] >> \setupsection[section-6][

Re: [NTG-context] vertical position of framed sucks!

2008-08-29 Thread Peter Rolf
Steffen Wolfrum schrieb: > Hi, > > sorry for my foggy post last night (02:50h ...) > > Hopefully this example makes it clearer: > -- > > \starttext > \showframe > > \definehead[EbeneFuenf][subsubsubsection] > \setupsection[section-6][conversion=characters,previousnumber=yes] > \def\FuenfCo

Re: [NTG-context] big are big with lucida

2008-08-29 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 10:23 AM, Taco Hoekwater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Wolfgang Schuster wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 8:50 AM, Eric DÉTREZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Le 29 août 08 à 04:51, Yue Wang a écrit : >>> Are you sure? see the first line of the attachment. >>> It seems t

Re: [NTG-context] vertical position of framed sucks!

2008-08-29 Thread Steffen Wolfrum
Hi, sorry for my foggy post last night (02:50h ...) Hopefully this example makes it clearer: -- \starttext \showframe \definehead[EbeneFuenf] [subsubsubsection] \setupsection[section-6][conversion=characters,previousnumber=yes] \def\FuenfCommand#1{#1.} \def\CurrentEbeneFuenfNumber#1#2% {\hbox

Re: [NTG-context] problem with frenchpunctuation

2008-08-29 Thread Hans Hagen
Peter Münster wrote: > Hello, > > there is no space before the \type{}: > > % engine=luatex > \setcharacterspacing[frenchpunctuation] > \starttext > «\type{bla}» > \stoptext i added an optional stripper (alternative=1 to the definitions) \starttext \setcharacterspacing[frenchpunctuation]

Re: [NTG-context] big are big with lucida

2008-08-29 Thread Taco Hoekwater
Wolfgang Schuster wrote: > On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 8:50 AM, Eric DÉTREZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Le 29 août 08 à 04:51, Yue Wang a écrit : >> >>> Are you sure? see the first line of the attachment. >> It seems that the text you sent is writen with CM fonts. >> The problem is only with Lucida f

Re: [NTG-context] vertical position of framed sucks!

2008-08-29 Thread Peter Rolf
Steffen Wolfrum schrieb: > Hi, > > in order to write a command=... for \setuphead I am fighting with the > following \framed: > > > \starttext > \showframe > > \def\TestFrame% > {\hbox to \hsize\bgroup% > \tbox{\midaligned\framed[frame=on,align=middle,width=0.85\textwidth] > {{\kern0.75em}Te

Re: [NTG-context] headers and footers

2008-08-29 Thread Jano Kula
Hi, Alan Stone wrote: > Hi, > > Main manual pg 78, § 4.17: \setup*texts /[.1.]/ [.2.] [.3.] commands > > "When the first argument is left out it is taken for granted that the > footer and header should be place under or over the pagebody (text)." > > What does this mean ? First (optional)

Re: [NTG-context] problem with frenchpunctuation

2008-08-29 Thread Hans Hagen
Peter Münster wrote: > Hello, > > there is no space before the \type{}: > > % engine=luatex > \setcharacterspacing[frenchpunctuation] > \starttext > «\type{bla}» > \stoptext i do a check on the next char being a glyph i'll remove that check, but at some point we need to become more explicit ab

Re: [NTG-context] big are big with lucida

2008-08-29 Thread Yue Wang
This is of course Lucida Expert fonts. (The quality of the image is not so good, because I cannot upload large attachments. that's it.) On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 2:50 PM, Eric DÉTREZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Le 29 août 08 à 04:51, Yue Wang a écrit : > >> Are you sure? see the first line of th

Re: [NTG-context] big are big with lucida

2008-08-29 Thread Yue Wang
> Allright, I'm not a font expert. > Here is what I get when I disable > \def\LBRbig {\@@dobig{0.920}} > \def\LBRBig {\@@dobig{1.080}} > \def\LBRbigg {\@@dobig{1.342}} > \def\LBRBigg {\@@dobig{1.603}} > \def\LBRbiggg{\@@dobig{1.772}} > \def\LBRBiggg{\@@dobig{2.125}} > : Oh, My God~ Make sure you

Re: [NTG-context] vertical position of framed sucks!

2008-08-29 Thread Hans Hagen
Steffen Wolfrum wrote: > Hi, > > in order to write a command=... for \setuphead I am fighting with the > following \framed: > > > \starttext > \showframe > > \def\TestFrame% > {\hbox to \hsize\bgroup% > \tbox{\midaligned\framed[frame=on,align=middle,width=0.85\textwidth]{{\kern0.75em}Test}}% >

Re: [NTG-context] Font questions once again...

2008-08-29 Thread Hans Hagen
Marcin Borkowski wrote: >> I'm still optimistically waiting for "Torunisation" of Poltawskiego :) actually the term used since lm came around and gyre started is "lm-ination" which might be read as "elimination" of mess -) -

Re: [NTG-context] big are big with lucida

2008-08-29 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 8:50 AM, Eric DÉTREZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Le 29 août 08 à 04:51, Yue Wang a écrit : > >> Are you sure? see the first line of the attachment. > > It seems that the text you sent is writen with CM fonts. > The problem is only with Lucida fonts. This is *not* Latin/C

Re: [NTG-context] big are big with lucida

2008-08-29 Thread Eric DÉTREZ
Le 29 août 08 à 08:59, Wolfgang Schuster a écrit : On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 8:50 AM, Eric DÉTREZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Le 29 août 08 à 04:51, Yue Wang a écrit : Are you sure? see the first line of the attachment. It seems that the text you sent is writen with CM fonts. The problem is

Re: [NTG-context] headers and footers

2008-08-29 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 7:18 PM, Alan Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Main manual pg 78, § 4.17: \setup*texts [.1.] [.2.] [.3.] commands > > "When the first argument is left out it is taken for granted that the footer > and header should be place under or over the pagebody (text)." > > W