Hi,
I updated context-minimals today and \mainlanguage[es] is broken.
Example:
\mainlanguage[es]
\starttext
\chapter[]{Cap1}
Hello World.
\stoptext
$ texexec --pdf example.tex
! Undefined control sequence.
argument \itulo
The problem is lang-ita.tex :
*** lang-ita.tex.old
On Wednesday 26 August 2009 17:29:20 Hans Hagen wrote:
John Culleton wrote:
PDF X/1a:2001 is an old pdf standard still required by some
important American printers. Han The Thanh et al. has created a
package for pdfLatex. I wonder if there is a route to this
output using Context?
it
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 3:22 PM, John Culletonj...@wexfordpress.com wrote:
On Wednesday 26 August 2009 17:29:20 Hans Hagen wrote:
John Culleton wrote:
PDF X/1a:2001 is an old pdf standard still required by some
important American printers. Han The Thanh et al. has created a
package for
$ context --ctx=x-ldx x-ldx.lua
fails in
minimals/tex/texmf-context/scripts/context/lua
Maybe an error on mtxrun, for which I have made a temp. patch :
$ diff mtxrun.orig mtxrun
123c123
return not find(find,%S)
---
return not find(self,%S)
Even so, there are some errors like
Hi,
I have Intel Core Duo and when I run texexec the CPU resource in gnome
is marked about 50%. Is it mean that texexec only use one processor? If
it's, can you think to improve it for scalability?
Just a curious question.
Xan.
PS: Please, CCme.
Xan wrote:
Hi,
I have Intel Core Duo and when I run texexec the CPU resource in gnome
is marked about 50%. Is it mean that texexec only use one processor? If
it's, can you think to improve it for scalability?
Just a curious question.
Run two jobs at once ;-)
Seriously: no, typesetting
luigi scarso wrote:
$ context --ctx=x-ldx x-ldx.lua
fails in
minimals/tex/texmf-context/scripts/context/lua
hm, runs ok here (on the base path)
Hans
-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 11:42 PM, Hans Hagenpra...@wxs.nl wrote:
luigi scarso wrote:
$ context --ctx=x-ldx x-ldx.lua
fails in
minimals/tex/texmf-context/scripts/context/lua
hm, runs ok here (on the base path)
hmm maybe I have messed something ...
I will retry with a fresh last current
--
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 11:42 PM, Hans Hagenpra...@wxs.nl wrote:
luigi scarso wrote:
$ context --ctx=x-ldx x-ldx.lua
fails in
minimals/tex/texmf-context/scripts/context/lua
hm, runs ok here (on the base path)
Hm, current seems broken
In base path
$ context --ctx=x-ldx x-ldx.lua
En/na Taco Hoekwater ha escrit:
Xan wrote:
Hi,
I have Intel Core Duo and when I run texexec the CPU resource in
gnome is marked about 50%. Is it mean that texexec only use one
processor? If it's, can you think to improve it for scalability?
Just a curious question.
Run two jobs at once
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 11:42 PM, Hans Hagenpra...@wxs.nl wrote:
luigi scarso wrote:
$ context --ctx=x-ldx x-ldx.lua
fails in
minimals/tex/texmf-context/scripts/context/lua
hm, runs ok here (on the base path)
Also with beta
...tex/minimals-2009-08-beta/tex/texmf-linux/bin/mtxrun:123: bad
luigi scarso wrote:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 11:42 PM, Hans Hagenpra...@wxs.nl wrote:
luigi scarso wrote:
$ context --ctx=x-ldx x-ldx.lua
fails in
minimals/tex/texmf-context/scripts/context/lua
hm, runs ok here (on the base path)
Also with beta
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 1:05 AM, Hans Hagenpra...@wxs.nl wrote:
luigi scarso wrote:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 11:42 PM, Hans Hagenpra...@wxs.nl wrote:
luigi scarso wrote:
$ context --ctx=x-ldx x-ldx.lua
fails in
minimals/tex/texmf-context/scripts/context/lua
hm, runs ok here (on the base
13 matches
Mail list logo
