Hi,
Bryant Eastham wrote:
>
> Bug, or my lack of understanding?
Bug. There is a luatex fix in the repository already
(there is a small optimization in the font that I
handled badly).
Best wishes,
Taco
___
If your
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 16:54, Jörg Hagmann wrote:
> Mojca has sorted out my problems with minimal installations. Since our
> correspondence was private, I would like to share the conclusions:
>
> I had old and new installations and "source /path/oldtex/tex/setuptex
> /path/oldtex/tex" in the bash
All:
Alan comments below on my "aggressive" post. I apologize if it was seen
that way. I am serious in my evaluation of ConTeXt, and my questions are
quite serious as well.
I cannot justify the effort in and cost of converting some 35 documents
(many hundreds of pages) into a new format without a
All-
On Windows XP, latest contextminimal:
\definefont[Japanese][msmincho]
\Japanese
\starttext
Hello
\stoptext
Yields:
(mincho.tex
ConTeXt ver: 2009.08.19 17:10 MKIV fmt: 2009.10.22 int:
english/English
[snip]
load otf | loading: c:/windows/fonts/msmincho.ttf
!
On Wednesday 21 October 2009 18:52:21 Bryant Eastham wrote:
>
> 1. Should I use mkii or mkiv? If mkii, then what should I plan on as
> schedule for upgrading?
I asked this question recently and was told that it was
probably pretty safe now to use mkiv, "as the developers
use mkiv themselves".
My
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
On Oct 19, 2009, at 11:14 AM, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
fixed in next version; i'll send you a patch
Excellent, your patch works!
Thanks, and all best
Thomas
Sorry to be a PITA, but could you fix references to items as well? They
don't work either in mkiv:
\sta
