Oliver Heins wrote:
Is there any context way to define these kind of shorthands? (Babel
has the \decl...@shorthand internal command.)
None are predefined, but you can install your own operations into
context's || discretionary command.
Try this, I think it is ok:
\definetextmodediscretionar
Am 14.11.2009 um 11:45 schrieb Taco Hoekwater:
> (Kinder|-)|Armut |!-|rat Au|ff|assung
Auf|*|fassung
Wolfgang
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg
Taco Hoekwater writes:
> Oliver Heins wrote:
>>
>> Is there any context way to define these kind of shorthands? (Babel
>> has the \decl...@shorthand internal command.)
>
> None are predefined, but you can install your own operations into
> context's || discretionary command.
>
> Try this, I thin
>
> Still another question. I have to write:
>
> \noindent\action[bottomframe=off,rightframe=off]{}\action[bottomframe=off]{}
> because the following does not work:
> \noindent\action[bottomframe=off,rightframe=off]{}
> \action[bottomframe=off]{}
> But the second I find more readable. Is
After further experimentation, I am still stumped; so I am resending this.
The attached file will compile only if I comment out
(a) header=2pc in \setuplayout
or
(b) \setupbodyfont[lmodern,rm,10.5pt]
or
(c) \placelegend
or
(d) \dorecurse{3}{\input knuth}
I am running MK2 using the penultima
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 4:03 AM, Mojca Miklavec <
mojca.miklavec.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have tried to compile an old document (written in mkii times). Among
> other problems that I yet need to isolate, the following minimal
> example doesn't want to compile: $\bigl| x \bigr>$ since
Hello folks,
Does anybody know if there is something like "texexec" for latex
users? Specifically, I'm hoping for a single command that runs the
pdflatex/bibtex combination as many times as is required to reach a
fixed point.
Thanks,
- a
_
On Sat, 14 Nov 2009, Adam Megacz wrote:
Does anybody know if there is something like "texexec" for latex
users? Specifically, I'm hoping for a single command that runs the
pdflatex/bibtex combination as many times as is required to reach a
fixed point.
There are many such scripts; the two tha
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 4:03 AM, Mojca Miklavec <
mojca.miklavec.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
I have tried to compile an old document (written in mkii times). Among
other problems that I yet need to isolate, the following minimal
example doesn't want to compile: $\bigl|
On Sun, 15 Nov 2009, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 4:03 AM, Mojca Miklavec <
mojca.miklavec.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
I have tried to compile an old document (written in mkii times). Among
other problems that I yet need to isolate, the following min
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
The attached patch gives a working solution for lmmath but does not work
with cambria. I don't know if the latter is a fault of context mkiv or
luatex.
"Does not work" as in: no error, but no delimiter either? That would
be a side-effect of Cambria not having defined su
On Sun, 15 Nov 2009, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
The attached patch gives a working solution for lmmath but does not work
with cambria. I don't know if the latter is a fault of context mkiv or
luatex.
"Does not work" as in: no error, but no delimiter either?
No scaled del
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
I personally do not like this behavior of plain tex, with \left< being
same as \left\langle. In the long run, all such delimiters should be
defined similar to mathml fences,
\definemathfence[average][left=\langle, right=\rangle, scale=auto|none]
etc. Should we be really
13 matches
Mail list logo
