[NTG-context] startbuffer fails with %

2010-01-05 Thread H. van der Meer
\startbuffer[ABC]% {} Braces at beginning fails with buffer \stopbuffer \starttext \getbuffer[ABC] \stoptext Error message: ! File ended while scanning use of \dododowithbuffer. \par Remove the {}'s at the beginning and all is well. The culprit however is the % in the first line

[NTG-context] What is the luatex version of \pdfescapehex

2010-01-05 Thread Zhichu Chen
Hi, I've written a very old module which used a lot of pdf primitives like \pdfescapehex and \pdfescapename etc. and it turns out not they don't work in mkiv. So I just want to know are there any alternatives? TIA -- Best Regards Chen

Re: [NTG-context] Referencing...

2010-01-05 Thread Hans Hagen
On 5-1-2010 14:46, Willi Egger wrote: Is there something changed in the approach in MKIV? sure, no common note code in mkii and mkiv fixed, Hans - Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE

Re: [NTG-context] defineenumeration does not work with MKIV. Works with MKII

2010-01-05 Thread Vladimir Lomov
Hi. 2010/1/5 Wolfgang Schuster : > > Am 05.01.2010 um 14:56 schrieb Vladimir Lomov: > Vladimir, I am not sure that the settings are incorrect. Why does it work with MKII then? Also it worked with MKIV before. It broke only recently. >>> >>> Add 'headalign=flushright'. >>> >> Hm, this

Re: [NTG-context] defineenumeration does not work with MKIV. Works with MKII

2010-01-05 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Am 05.01.2010 um 14:56 schrieb Vladimir Lomov: >>> Vladimir, I am not sure that the settings are incorrect. Why does it >>> work with MKII then? Also it worked with MKIV before. It broke only >>> recently. >> >> Add 'headalign=flushright'. >> > Hm, this gives more unpleasant result for MKIV for

Re: [NTG-context] defineenumeration does not work with MKIV. Works with MKII

2010-01-05 Thread Vladimir Lomov
Hello. 2010/1/5 Curiouslearn : > Vladimir, I am not sure that the settings are incorrect. Why does it > work with MKII then? Also it worked with MKIV before. It broke only > recently. Sorry, I didn't try to check texexec (MKII) also I just checked context (MKIV). > > Can someone please throw light

Re: [NTG-context] defineenumeration does not work with MKIV. Works with MKII

2010-01-05 Thread Curiouslearn
Thanks! That worked great. On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 8:52 AM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: > > Am 05.01.2010 um 14:22 schrieb Curiouslearn: > >> Vladimir, I am not sure that the settings are incorrect. Why does it >> work with MKII then? Also it worked with MKIV before. It broke only >> recently. > > Ad

Re: [NTG-context] defineenumeration does not work with MKIV. Works with MKII

2010-01-05 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Am 05.01.2010 um 14:22 schrieb Curiouslearn: > Vladimir, I am not sure that the settings are incorrect. Why does it > work with MKII then? Also it worked with MKIV before. It broke only > recently. Add 'headalign=flushright'. Wolfgang ___

[NTG-context] Referencing...

2010-01-05 Thread Willi Egger
Hi, I have small tabulations which contain references to footnotes in the header line. - The footnotes are placed correctly, how ever if I refer to the references I get in 2 out of the three cases ?? i.e. ConTeXt does not know the reference. I am puzzled because it works for the third ref

Re: [NTG-context] defineenumeration does not work with MKIV. Works with MKII

2010-01-05 Thread Curiouslearn
Vladimir, I am not sure that the settings are incorrect. Why does it work with MKII then? Also it worked with MKIV before. It broke only recently. Can someone please throw light on this? Is the disapperance of the numbers, as Vladimir suggests, expected behavior of the minimal example in MKIV.

Re: [NTG-context] Thoughts on ConTeXt: ditched

2010-01-05 Thread Manuel P.
Il 03/01/2010 19.45, Piotr Kopszak ha scritto: Well, well, ConTeXt can help you if you give him a little love and don't try pull all triggers at once. Having written my Ph.D. in LaTeX and published couple of books in ConTeXT I can assure you, ConTeXt is surprisingly better suited for "scientif

Re: [NTG-context] Natural Tables Cell Borders

2010-01-05 Thread Hans Hagen
On 5-1-2010 4:02, Curiouslearn wrote: Thanks Wolfgang. I am not yet proficient enough in Metapost or Context to understand your code. But will look at it more carefully later. Meanwhile, is there any further work going on on Natural Tables? Are there plans to introduce the ability to have border

Re: [NTG-context] \setupenumeration(s) was: defineenumeration does not work with MKIV

2010-01-05 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Am 05.01.2010 um 05:08 schrieb Vladimir Lomov: > 2010/1/5 Wolfgang Schuster : >> Sorry to hijack your post and since we're already there, why are >> \setupenumerations >> and \setupdescriptions written in the plural form. >> >>> \setupenumerations[problem][stopper=)] >> >> When I would follow