Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 06.03.10 18:19, schrieb Troy Henderson:
I updated my ConTeXt distro, and I'm still getting a similar filesize.
Peter uses a newer LuaTeX.
There was a bug in luatex that is now fixed in TRUNK. There will
be a new official luatex beta (0.51) next week.
Best wish
> Somewhere in my twists and turns to get Mark IV working today, it appears
> XeTeX has been broken. Running `texexec --xtx' on any ConTeXt file results
> in:
>
> ! Undefined control sequence.
> \PDFversion ->1.\the \pdfminorversion
>
> All I've been able to find out is that these macros are som
Am 06.03.10 21:56, schrieb Matthias Weber:
Dear all,
maybe a catchy subject line will get attention -:)
Indeed, the cow seems to be missing in mk2 and is overly present in
mk4 in the sense that my own image cow.jpg within the same directory
as the
document below gets ignored in favor of the c
> \startMPpage
> arbitrary mp code
> \stopMPpage
Beautiful. Thanks!
Troy
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mai
On Sat, 6 Mar 2010, Troy Henderson wrote:
Is it possible to get ConTeXt (MKIV) to automatically crop out the
whitespace from its PDF output? I know that I can use the external
utility `pdfcrop`, but I was wondering if this is possible with
ConTeXt itself. This would be useful when generating M
> maybe a catchy subject line will get attention -:)
Doesn't the old TV commercial (at least here in the U.S.) say instead
"where's the beef"?
Troy Henderson
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, plea
Is it possible to get ConTeXt (MKIV) to automatically crop out the
whitespace from its PDF output? I know that I can use the external
utility `pdfcrop`, but I was wondering if this is possible with
ConTeXt itself. This would be useful when generating MetaPost
graphics where the graphic is the onl
Updating my LuaTeX did the trick folks. Thanks for the tip.
Next question coming (in another thread).
Troy
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-cont
2010/3/7 Mojca Miklavec :
> On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 11:45, views63 wrote:
> No, better put them to texmf-local or texmf-fonts, not to texmf, else
> they will be deleted when you synchronize the archive next time.
Thank you very much. now I can use first-setup without "--keep"
synchronize the archiv
Dear all,
maybe a catchy subject line will get attention -:)
Indeed, the cow seems to be missing in mk2 and is overly present in
mk4 in the sense that my own image cow.jpg within the same directory
as the
document below gets ignored in favor of the cow that's present in the
mk4 minimals. T
2010/3/6 Tom :
> My document was produced by pdfTeX-1.40.9, PDF version 1.5 and opens with
> Adobe Reader 8.1 or so it says. Is there a way to select a different PDF
> version (older) to be produced? Some printers I work with want PDFs to be
\pdfminorversion=4
Best
Martin
_
Am 06.03.2010 19:42, schrieb Troy Henderson:
> Ok then. Now for a newbie question. What is the best way to update
> LuaTeX? I assumed the first-setup.sh script in my ConTeX-minimals
> installation would do it for me.
>
i always update by hand, so better ask Mojca about it. but as the
context and
Ok then. Now for a newbie question. What is the best way to update
LuaTeX? I assumed the first-setup.sh script in my ConTeX-minimals
installation would do it for me.
Troy
___
If your question is of interest to other
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 11:45, views63 wrote:
>
> 1. put the archive keep file structure to "\context\tex\texmf\fonts "
No, better put them to texmf-local or texmf-fonts, not to texmf, else
they will be deleted when you synchronize the archive next time.
Mojca
_
Am 06.03.2010 18:49, schrieb Troy Henderson:
> What version of LuaTeX do you have? I have the following:
>
>> This is LuaTeX, Version beta-0.50.0-2009122519
>
This is LuaTeX, Version beta-0.51.0-2010030215 (rev 3445)
What version of LuaTeX do you have? I have the following:
> This is LuaTeX, Version beta-0.50.0-2009122519
Troy
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg
Am 06.03.2010 18:19, schrieb Troy Henderson:
> I updated my ConTeXt distro, and I'm still getting a similar filesize.
> I've attached the new LOG file.
>
no big differences, but see for yourself. i guess you also have to
update luatex then.
Peter
(surface.tex
ConTeXt ver: 2010.03.02 12:34 MKIV
Am 06.03.10 18:19, schrieb Troy Henderson:
I updated my ConTeXt distro, and I'm still getting a similar filesize.
Peter uses a newer LuaTeX.
Wolfgang
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, pleas
I updated my ConTeXt distro, and I'm still getting a similar filesize.
I've attached the new LOG file.
Troy
surface.log
Description: Binary data
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an e
Thanks Aditya. I'll update my ConTeXt distro then.
Troy
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-
On Sat, 6 Mar 2010, Troy Henderson wrote:
Peter,
Is there anything special that you're doing? I've attached my LOG
file from my MKIV run.
Using a newer version of MkIV. You are using 2010.02.20 (2nd line of the
log) while Peter is using 2010.03.02.
I use 2010.02.23 and get the same file s
Peter,
Is there anything special that you're doing? I've attached my LOG
file from my MKIV run.
Troy
surface.log
Description: Binary data
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry t
Am 06.03.2010 14:54, schrieb Troy Henderson:
> I am writing because there appears to be a very large (i.e.,
> approximately a factor of 10) difference in filesizes of the same
> MetaPost graphic generated in the following 2 ways
>
> (1) Including a common MetaPost source "common.mp" into a minimal
Is there a way to get MKIV to compress it for me then automagically?
Troy
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mail
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Troy Henderson wrote:
> For the record, with color enabled, MKII has an output size of about
> 61kB. With color disabled, MKII has an output size of about 53kB.
> Both cases are significantly less than MKIV.
mkii uses mptopdf by \write18
--
luigi
For the record, with color enabled, MKII has an output size of about
61kB. With color disabled, MKII has an output size of about 53kB.
Both cases are significantly less than MKIV.
Troy
___
If your question is of inter
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 2:54 PM, Troy Henderson wrote:
> I am writing because there appears to be a very large (i.e.,
> approximately a factor of 10) difference in filesizes of the same
> MetaPost graphic generated in the following 2 ways
>
> (1) Including a common MetaPost source "common.mp" into
I don't know what you mean by "look like." Unable to find documentation of
an option or command to embed (likely due to my looking in the wrong
documentation), I searched the message archive and found a discussion of
embedding fonts with Mark-IV. This led me to believe that fonts may not
automatica
I am writing because there appears to be a very large (i.e.,
approximately a factor of 10) difference in filesizes of the same
MetaPost graphic generated in the following 2 ways
(1) Including a common MetaPost source "common.mp" into a minimal MKIV
document and compiling with `context surface.tex`
Thank you very much. Just a comment: it is better to define
\def\scr #1{\text{\ralfsmithfs #1}}
In this way, font sizes (superscript and subscript) are also available.
MO
On 3/5/2010 2:15 PM, views63 wrote:
2010/3/4 Mehdi Omidali:
Hi,
I followed http://wiki.contextgarden.net/rsfs and compil
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 03:22, wrote:
>
> And Google
> is very bad in finding context material.
There's a Google "special search" on the wiki that should be able to
search through the relevant material only.
Mojca
__
31 matches
Mail list logo