Re: [NTG-context] Chapter headers variation

Am 05.05.10 21:14, schrieb pol stra: Hello, i realy like the example of the wiki about chapter headers , but i wonder if it is possible to have a deeptext only on the first letter? \define[1]\ChaptertextCommand {\getfirstcharac

Re: [NTG-context] \showmathcharacters doesn't work (MacTex 2009)

On 16 mai 2010, at 12:25, Hans Hagen wrote: > just a remark: showmathcharacters is a mkii command and for luatex (i.e. > mkiv) there are other commands; as i never run xetex (apart from generating > formats) i haven't tested all those show-commands but it is unlikely that > something will chan

Re: [NTG-context] \showmathcharacters doesn't work (MacTex 2009)

On 16-5-2010 9:26, Mojca Miklavec wrote: On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 04:21, Riobard wrote: Hi Otared, Actually I'm using MKII (ConTeXt + XeTeX). MacTex 2009 (based on Tex Live 2009) does not produce correct result. I installed ConTeXt minimals and it worked (again, with XeTeX, so MKII I assume?).

Re: [NTG-context] czech sorting in MiIV

-- From: "Aditya Mahajan" Sent: Sunday, May 16, 2010 5:08 AM To: "mailing list for ConTeXt users" Subject: Re: [NTG-context] czech sorting in MiIV Also I have question. In my bachelor thesis I'm describe language support for ConTeXt and when I

Re: [NTG-context] \showmathcharacters doesn't work (MacTex 2009)

>> ConTeXt has not been integrated into TL tree yet (I didn't really >> check, but I didn't hear about that yet), however this might happen >> soon. > > I am waiting until the next (bugfix) current before I do that. Sure, that makes perfect sense. It's pointless to hurry to much. There are quite s

Re: [NTG-context] \showmathcharacters doesn't work (MacTex 2009)

Mojca Miklavec wrote: ConTeXt has not been integrated into TL tree yet (I didn't really check, but I didn't hear about that yet), however this might happen soon. I am waiting until the next (bugfix) current before I do that. Best wishes, Taco __

Re: [NTG-context] \showmathcharacters doesn't work (MacTex 2009)

On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 04:21, Riobard wrote: > Hi Otared, > > Actually I'm using MKII (ConTeXt + XeTeX). MacTex 2009 (based on Tex > Live 2009) does not produce correct result. I installed ConTeXt > minimals and it worked (again, with XeTeX, so MKII I assume?). I can confirm that it's broken in M