Re: [NTG-context] 620 pages limit?

2011-03-17 Thread Vnpenguin
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 17:54, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote: On 14-3-2011 10:35, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: Am 14.03.2011 um 18:02 schrieb luigi scarso: \starttext \dorecurse{5000} {\input knuth \page } \stoptext A little bit faster but with the same error message: \count0=0

Re: [NTG-context] Creation of PDF Oddly Differs on Ubuntu and Mac OS X

2011-03-17 Thread Taco Hoekwater
On 03/16/2011 10:10 PM, Raymond LeClair wrote: I am getting the following exception using the LuLu Python publication API on Mac OS X 10.6.6 with Python 2.6.6 or 2.7.1: ServiceError: Couldn't create Lulu project. '{error_type: LFilesystemException, error_value: shell command failed: rm -rf

[NTG-context] symbols fail in mkiv

2011-03-17 Thread Jean Magnan de Bornier
Hi all, The following file has the expected output with texexec but with mkiv the symbols are replaced by question marks in the output; all my other tests with symbols actually fail with mkiv. .. \starttext Hello world! \usesymbols[mvs] \symbol[martinvogel 2][PointingHand]

Re: [NTG-context] Creation of PDF Oddly Differs on Ubuntu and Mac OS X

2011-03-17 Thread Mojca Miklavec
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 08:52, Taco Hoekwater wrote: As it says: Directory not empty, perhaps you could look in the finder or terminal to see what is still in there. I actually expect that there is a Finder-specific file or folder there, which would mean that the actual problem has nothing to

Re: [NTG-context] symbols fail in mkiv

2011-03-17 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Am 17.03.2011 um 08:59 schrieb Jean Magnan de Bornier: Hi all, The following file has the expected output with texexec but with mkiv the symbols are replaced by question marks in the output; all my other tests with symbols actually fail with mkiv. You need for mkiv the marvosym font in

Re: [NTG-context] (RSFS) font installation

2011-03-17 Thread Stefan Müller
Hi mathew, thanks for your reply! On 16.03.2011 16:58, mathew wrote: On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 09:00, Stefan Müllerwarrence@gmx.de wrote: [...] I put the rsfs directory with its subdirs from the .zip to the folder c:\context\tex\texmf-fonts\fonts\data\ as Wolfgang suggested [4] and ran

[NTG-context] \writetolist spurious space in the first line hereafter

2011-03-17 Thread Willi Egger
Hi all, I detected that after issuing \writetolist, that there is a unwanted space in the first line after this command. This occurs when indenting is on and off. Please refer to the attached minimal example. I am using ConTeXt 2011.02.25 22:03, LuaTEX beta-0.65.0-2010121316 Kind regards

Re: [NTG-context] cals tables - UNSOLVED

2011-03-17 Thread R. Ermers
Dear All, I am still trying to typeset cals tables. I have 1. an environment document with instructions. 2. an xml docbook file containing cals tables Note that the original cals tables (docbook standard) use table, tgroup, etc. but for ConTeXt purposes this - as far as I understand - needs

[NTG-context] Boekplan books

2011-03-17 Thread Procházka Lukáš Ing . - Pontex s . r . o .
Hello, I just received the Fonts in ConTeXt; thanks that such publication exists. One suggestion: - Wouldn't be good to offer both grey scale and coloured version of the book? The coloured version would be more expensive, indeed. But one would have a choice; and Hans and Taco's documents are

Re: [NTG-context] \writetolist spurious space in the first line hereafter

2011-03-17 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Am 17.03.2011 um 11:32 schrieb Willi Egger: Hi all, I detected that after issuing \writetolist, that there is a unwanted space in the first line after this command. This occurs when indenting is on and off. Add a comment after the last brace, i.e. \writetolist[…]{}{…}% and write the

Re: [NTG-context] symbols fail in mkiv

2011-03-17 Thread Jean Magnan de Bornier
Le 17 mars à 09:34:48 Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@googlemail.com écrit notamment: | Am 17.03.2011 um 08:59 schrieb Jean Magnan de Bornier: | Hi all, | The following file has the expected output with texexec but with mkiv the | symbols are replaced by question marks in the output; all

Re: [NTG-context] (RSFS) font installation

2011-03-17 Thread Ulrike Fischer
Am Thu, 17 Mar 2011 10:05:17 +0100 schrieb Stefan Müller: Is this a typo and do you mean .pfm file? Otherwise I don't get it. Should I just copy the .pfb files to C:\Windows\Fonts, too? You need both pfm and pfb in the fonts folder. But windows probably pulled the pfb along with the pfm when

Re: [NTG-context] \writetolist spurious space in the first line hereafter

2011-03-17 Thread Willi Egger
Hello Wolfgang! thank you so much for this answer. Thanks to regular expressions it is now solved throughout the whole book. Willi On 17 Mar 2011, at 11:47, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: Am 17.03.2011 um 11:32 schrieb Willi Egger: Hi all, I detected that after issuing \writetolist, that

Re: [NTG-context] Creation of PDF Oddly Differs on Ubuntu and Mac OS X

2011-03-17 Thread Raymond LeClair
A Lulu developer was able to find out that the original error was coming out of the PDFLib library: {error_type:PDFlibException,error_value:Handle parameter or option of type 'page' has bad value 0} Does that mean anything to anyone? On Mar 17, 2011, at 4:01 AM, Mojca Miklavec wrote: On Thu,

Re: [NTG-context] (RSFS) font installation

2011-03-17 Thread Stefan Müller
Ah, thanks for that. Indeed, there are .pfm and .pfb files in the Fonts directory now. But still mtxrun --script fonts --reload doesn't seem to check for those file types... Best regards, Stefan. On 17.03.2011 13:40, Ulrike Fischer wrote: Am Thu, 17 Mar 2011 10:05:17 +0100 schrieb Stefan

Re: [NTG-context] (RSFS) font installation

2011-03-17 Thread mathew
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 04:05, Stefan Müller warrence@gmx.de wrote: I'm using Windows Vista 64bit and installed the rsfs font by right-clicking the .pfm files. I thought I had to use the .pfb files, but Windows did not recognize those and didn't show Install in the context menu. After

[NTG-context] pageshifting

2011-03-17 Thread Willi Egger
Hi, it looks as of there is a bug in page-imp in MKIV. The problem does not show up in MKII. When using vertical and or horizontal pageshift lists while arranging an error occurs: ! Incomplete \iffalse; all text was ignored after line 27. system tex error on line 0 in file :

Re: [NTG-context] (RSFS) font installation

2011-03-17 Thread Otared Kavian
Hi Stefan, It seems that somehow on your system the rsfs font is not seen by mkiv. In fact after the following command mtxrun --script fonts --reload you should say mtxrun --script fonts --list --pattern=rsfs in order to see whether any rsfs font is detected by mkiv. If the

[NTG-context] Accents messed up

2011-03-17 Thread Pau
Hi, This is TeXExec | version 6.2.1 - 1997-2009 - PRAGMA ADE/POD I am writing a presentation like this in French: \language[fr] \mainlanguage[fr] %\enableregime[utf-8] \enableregime[latin1] \usemodule[pre-fuzzy] \usemodule[amsl] \useMPlibrary[txt] my terminal encoding is set to UTF-8. Running

Re: [NTG-context] (RSFS) font installation

2011-03-17 Thread Stefan Müller
On 17.03.2011 16:04, mathew wrote: On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 04:05, Stefan Müllerwarrence@gmx.de wrote: I'm using Windows Vista 64bit and installed the rsfs font by right-clicking the .pfm files. I thought I had to use the .pfb files, but Windows did not recognize those and didn't show

Re: [NTG-context] (RSFS) font installation

2011-03-17 Thread Stefan Müller
So... I think I got somewhere now with the explanations from you and mathew. It seems that the problem were the missing .afm files (as mtxrun wanted those, not .pfm nor .pfb). I found two different solutions A and B: (1) Install fonts (.pfm) in Windows (2A) Put .afm files to C:\Windows\Fonts

[NTG-context] Hoefler font in Mark IV

2011-03-17 Thread Charles Doherty
Dear all, I have been using Hoefler font successfully in a newsletter. I am now processing it in MarkIV but I don't get bold or bold italic. Italic is not quite the same either. I am using simplefonts. I have the .dfont and the .ttf on my system. Any suggestions would be appreciated. Thanks,

Re: [NTG-context] Hoefler font in Mark IV

2011-03-17 Thread Christian
Run this: mtxrun --script fonts --reload Then check the output of this: mtxrun --script fonts --list --info --pattern=hoefler* If it doesn't list your fonts, theres something wrong. But it may give you something like this: hoeflertext hoeflertextregular Hoefler-Text.ttf

Re: [NTG-context] Accents messed up

2011-03-17 Thread Mojca Miklavec
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 17:24, Pau wrote: Hi, This is TeXExec | version 6.2.1 - 1997-2009 - PRAGMA ADE/POD I am writing a presentation like this in French: \language[fr] \mainlanguage[fr] %\enableregime[utf-8] \enableregime[latin1] \usemodule[pre-fuzzy] \usemodule[amsl]

Re: [NTG-context] Accents messed up

2011-03-17 Thread Peter Münster
Pau vim.u...@googlemail.com writes: %\enableregime[utf-8] Uncomment this line. \enableregime[latin1] Remove this line. my terminal encoding is set to UTF-8. Good. -- Peter ___ If your question

Re: [NTG-context] Hoefler font in Mark IV

2011-03-17 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Am 17.03.2011 um 17:55 schrieb Charles Doherty: Dear all, I have been using Hoefler font successfully in a newsletter. I am now processing it in MarkIV but I don't get bold or bold italic. Italic is not quite the same either. I am using simplefonts. I have the .dfont and the .ttf on my

Re: [NTG-context] (RSFS) font installation

2011-03-17 Thread mathew
On Mar 17, 2011, at 11:53, Stefan Müller wrote: Yes, I thought so. I just asked, because I couldn't find an environment variable with that name. Even after setuptex.bat typing echo %OSFONTDIR% did only print %OSFONTDIR% and not a list of paths, as I expected. There are defaults baked into

Re: [NTG-context] Difference between MKII, XeTeX and MKIV

2011-03-17 Thread mathew
On Mar 14, 2011, at 16:49, Marco wrote: I totally agree. But Cecil mentioned in another thread: »My document is mostly text.« Even if a few mp graphics are involved luatex is still noticeably slower. I look at it from the perspective that the last time I used TeX, my 8MHz Atari ST took

Re: [NTG-context] (RSFS) font installation

2011-03-17 Thread Khaled Hosny
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 09:42:38PM -0500, mathew wrote: - If the .pfm and .pfb files are sufficient for Windows, why does mtxrun specifically search for .afm files and not also for .pfm? Probably because mtxrun (and the rest of ConTeXt and LuaTeX) are written for Unix and ported to

Re: [NTG-context] cals tables - UNSOLVED

2011-03-17 Thread Aditya Mahajan
On Thu, 17 Mar 2011, R. Ermers wrote: Dear All, I am still trying to typeset cals tables. I have 1. an environment document with instructions. 2. an xml docbook file containing cals tables Note that the original cals tables (docbook standard) use table, tgroup, etc. but for ConTeXt purposes