Am 03.05.2011 um 01:26 schrieb Aditya Mahajan:
You can also put the text in a \hbox with “\setuptype[command=\hbox]”.
The command key from \setuptype is special because it accepts only
box commands (\hbox, \vbox, \framed …).
I don't see why that is the case. Looking at the code, it appears
Hi,
Inspired by the examples given in the MetaFun manual (Oct. 2010) I tried
a few, but I can't get them working!
I'm specially interested in the 'Anchors and layers' (p.257, screen
version!) feature. I typed in the MetaPost code as given on page 260,
defined the anchors, but no circles and
Hi Adam,
I you mean the gantt module, have a look at the mailinglist:
http://www.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/2010/054051.html
It was advised to upload it to tlcontrib instead, so the module is located
here:
I draw a figure by tikz but found it is not in the middle but a little
left of the page, and then I wrote a piece code and impoved my view.
And I tried to add some parameters to put the figure in the middle but failed.
Thanks for any tips and test code is below.
\usemodule[tikz]
Using the attached minimal example with biblio.bib, how can I get an
alphabetical publication-list with surname-Initials etc. when using numbers in
the thext? Shouldn't that be default? It is when using authoryear in the text
(comment/uncomment the relevant lines).
mkiv, current version:
On Tue, 3 May 2011, Gao Ya'nan wrote:
I draw a figure by tikz but found it is not in the middle but a little
left of the page, and then I wrote a piece code and impoved my view.
And I tried to add some parameters to put the figure in the middle but failed.
Does this
Dear ConTeXt folks,
`\dotsb` is not defined although it is defined in AMSTeX (amsmath) [1].
Please find the following minimal example also attached.
\starttext
This throws an error, since »\backslash dotsb« is not defined.
\startformula
1 + 2 +
Dear ConTeXt folks,
is there a module or a package people have created for common things
used in mathematics.
`\set{ a, b, c }` for a set.
`\EV{X}` for the expected value.
`\P{ X = ½ }` for the probability.
…
If not, maybe a module could be created and
Hi Hans,
I am sending again a message sent some two weeks ago, but probably it was lost…
It seems that the latest beta (version 2011.05.01 12:50) has a problem with
arrow in math mode, using Latin modern, while with Palatino the arrows are
correct.
Here is a minimal example and its PDF result
Am 03.05.2011 um 15:46 schrieb Paul Menzel:
Dear ConTeXt folks,
`\dotsb` is not defined although it is defined in AMSTeX (amsmath) [1].
Why don’t you use \cdots, i can see no difference between your linked example
and mine below.
\setupbodyfont[pagella]
\starttext
Hi,
please consider this:
\starttext
\math{flow_1}
\stoptext
When compiled with MkIV, space between f and l is quite big and doesn't
look very good. Is it a bug?
Spacing between letters when treated as individual variables is always a
bit fishy. In this case the math mode
On Tue, 3 May 2011, Paul Menzel wrote:
Dear ConTeXt folks,
is there a module or a package people have created for common things
used in mathematics.
`\set{ a, b, c }` for a set.
`\EV{X}` for the expected value.
`\P{ X = ½ }` for the probability.
…
If not, maybe a
On Tue, 3 May 2011, Paul Menzel wrote:
Dear ConTeXt folks,
`\dotsb` is not defined although it is defined in AMSTeX (amsmath) [1].
Is `\dotsb` not defined intentionally?
I do not completely understand why this command is needed. I think that
the intent of amstex is that the user should
On Tue, 3 May 2011, Otared Kavian wrote:
Hi Hans,
I am sending again a message sent some two weeks ago, but probably it was lost…
It seems that the latest beta (version 2011.05.01 12:50) has a problem
with arrow in math mode, using Latin modern, while with Palatino the
arrows are correct.
On Tue, 3 May 2011, Vedran Miletić wrote:
Hi,
please consider this:
\starttext
\math{flow_1}
\stoptext
When compiled with MkIV, space between f and l is quite big and doesn't
look very good. Is it a bug?
Definitely looks like a bug in italic correction. In principle, the
spacing with
I want to typeset a multiplication table, where there will be a horizontal
line after the first row, and a vertical line after the first column. In
LaTeX, I can use:
\[
\begin{array}{c|ccc}
\times0123456\\
\hline
\\
10123456\\
20246135\\
30362514\\
40415263\\
On Wed, 4 May 2011, Alasdair McAndrew wrote:
I want to typeset a multiplication table, where there will be a horizontal
line after the first row, and a vertical line after the first column. In
LaTeX, I can use:
\[
\begin{array}{c|ccc}
\times0123456\\
\hline
\\
10123456\\
On 4 mai 2011, at 05:57, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
[…]
It appears that a text mode minus is being used rather than the math mode
minus. I haven't checked why that is happening.
Thanks Aditya for your attention: yes you are right indeed, this is what
happens with LM, but not with Palatino.
Best
18 matches
Mail list logo
