Hi,
In the next beta \definexternalfigure is chained.
\starttext
\defineexternalfigure[test][width=2cm]
\defineexternalfigure[less][test][width=3cm,background=color,backgroundcolor=green]
\setupexternalfigure [less][height=.5cm]
\externalfigure[cow.pdf][test] \par
\externalfigure[cow.pdf][tes
On 20-7-2012 20:21, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
On 07/20/2012 08:01 PM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Hans speaks about something like this
\startone
…
\starttwo
…
\stopone
…
\stopone
where environment ranges overlap.
And to explain that a bit: it's not merely "ugly." If all you want is
the printed
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 10:11 PM, Meer, H. van der wrote:
> The space around formula with \placeformula is a bit too large to my
> taste, even in the case of \setupformulae[spaceafter=small]. Because
> setting this to 0pt didn't make much difference, I had to resort to
> spaceafter=-1ex. Why is t
The space around formula with \placeformula is a bit too large to my taste,
even in the case of \setupformulae[spaceafter=small]. Because setting this to
0pt didn't make much difference, I had to resort to spaceafter=-1ex. Why is
there seemingly always such a large space around the formula? Why
Hello,
I'm using context for an document with many figures. In some cases I
have figures that should appear side by side and/or one above the other
– but without combining them (\startcombination... \stopcombination).
This I want to avoid because I'd like to give them a plain caption (like
non
On Fri, Jul 20 2012, d_jan wrote:
>> \setupcaptions[location=bottom]
>> \def\PlaceRightFigure#1#2{{\setupcaptions[location=right]%
>> \placefigure{#1}{#2}}}
>> \starttext
>> \placefigure{caption 1}{figure 1}
>> \PlaceRightFigure{caption 2}{figure 2}
>> \placefigure{caption 3}{figure 3}
>> \st
Is it possible to set the caption position for some images to another position
than the one defined in \setupcations ?
The standard in my document is location=bottom but for some images I'd prefer
=right.
\setupcaptions[location=bottom]
\def\PlaceRightFigure#1#2{{\setupcaptions[location=right]%
On 07/20/2012 08:01 PM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Hans speaks about something like this
\startone
…
\starttwo
…
\stopone
…
\stopone
where environment ranges overlap.
And to explain that a bit: it's not merely "ugly." If all you want is
the printed book, you don't care about the ugliness and s
On 20/07/12 17:41, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
> Just a few comments on this helpful mail:
Thank you very much for your reply, Thomas.
> On 07/19/2012 12:57 PM, MANUEL GONZALEZ SUAREZ wrote:
>> I'm not a classical philologist, but the way ConTeXt works is much
>> clearer than ledmac to me (although
Am 20.07.2012 um 19:33 schrieb Sietse Brouwer:
> Hans wrote:
>> but as you mention the interface is a bit problematic as start/stop is not
>> nice when being nested
>
> Do you mean it doesn't look nice, or is it so that nesting or
> interleaving \startlinenote[tag] ... \stoplinenote[tag] enviro
I'm trying to get straight in my head what critical-edition-related
commands are already implemented in ConTeXt.
Implemented:
(a) footnotes on specific lines, specified inline: \linenote{note text}
(b) ditto on line ranges: \startlinenote[tag]{note text} ... \stoplinenote[tag]
(c) tag a line and r
On 07/20/2012 06:45 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
Actually ranges have always been supported (as we needed in the previous
century already for referring to passages in texts where students had to
comment on):
Yes, that's something I forgot in my mail: ask on the list, and chances
are that it has alrea
On 20-7-2012 17:41, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
This may be a bit more difficult, because it involves thinking about
proper input syntax. How do you want to mark this passage? If you can
come up with clean and unequivocal syntax and demonstrate it in an
example, your chances aren't too bad. However
Just a few comments on this helpful mail:
On 07/19/2012 12:57 PM, MANUEL GONZALEZ SUAREZ wrote:
I'm not a classical philologist, but the way ConTeXt works is much
clearer than ledmac to me (although I have only tested ledmac for a
couple of days).
I haven't looked at ledmac too closely, and of
On Fri, 20 Jul 2012, Thomas Friedrich wrote:
Hello together,
my old set-up was an Ubuntu/tex-live installation, but I recently
(finally) did a reset-up, and I am now running ArchLinux together with
the context-minimals-git from AUR [1]. This should contain the latest
build.
Yes, context-minim
On Fri, 20 Jul 2012, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 20-7-2012 02:49, Sietse Brouwer wrote:
When some command is mentioned on this mailing list, and people say
"somebody might want to add this information to the wiki", and the
command page doesn't even *exist* yet — don't despair. Creating it is
easy, no
Am 20.07.2012 um 12:39 schrieb Thomas Friedrich:
> Hello together,
>
> my old set-up was an Ubuntu/tex-live installation, but I recently
> (finally) did a reset-up, and I am now running ArchLinux together with
> the context-minimals-git from AUR [1]. This should contain the latest
> build. As
Hello together,
my old set-up was an Ubuntu/tex-live installation, but I recently
(finally) did a reset-up, and I am now running ArchLinux together with
the context-minimals-git from AUR [1]. This should contain the latest
build. As I understand it, there has been an update to the
letter-module,
Hi there,
I have a rather general question regarding the options for math fonts in
ConTeXt. As I understand from reading older posts to this list, there are
currently efforts for making either pagella math or an updated modern font
available. I am looking into this for quite some time now, but
On 20-7-2012 02:49, Sietse Brouwer wrote:
When some command is mentioned on this mailing list, and people say
"somebody might want to add this information to the wiki", and the
command page doesn't even *exist* yet — don't despair. Creating it is
easy, now.
Nice work, thanks!
Hans
--
20 matches
Mail list logo