[NTG-context] New module: crossref

2012-11-01 Thread Zenlima
Hi, after the feedback for my first module (pararef) and regarding my next upcoming module I decided to put crossref into its own module, so that it can be used by other modules or without any other module. http://modules.contextgarden.net/crossref Unluckily I forgot to fill out

[NTG-context] New module: crossref

2012-11-01 Thread Zenlima
Hi, after the feedback for my first module (pararef) and regarding my next upcoming module I decided to put crossref into its own module, so that it can be used by other modules or without any other module. http://modules.contextgarden.net/crossref Unluckily I forgot to fill out

Re: [NTG-context] scripts

2012-11-01 Thread Pontus Lurcock
On Thu 01 Nov 2012, Alan BRASLAU wrote: > Whats more, bash is found under /usr/local/bin/bash on FreeBSD so > #! /bin/bash > is bound to FAIL. One traditional solution is to use #!/usr/bin/env bash This of course assumes the path to env, but I believe that the env path is more standardized than

Re: [NTG-context] scripts

2012-11-01 Thread Alan BRASLAU
On Thu, 1 Nov 2012 12:10:58 +0100 Marco Patzer wrote: > 2012-11-01 Uwe Koloska: > > > There is stability in that /bin/sh always must be a (posix > > compatible) bourne (not again) style shell! > > True > > > * rewrite the scripts to be truly posix and use #! /bin/sh (the dash > > links from an

Re: [NTG-context] scripts

2012-11-01 Thread Marco Patzer
2012-11-01 Uwe Koloska: > There is stability in that /bin/sh always must be a (posix compatible) > bourne (not again) style shell! True > * rewrite the scripts to be truly posix and use #! /bin/sh (the dash > links from another mail may help) > * leave the scripts alone with all their bashisms a

Re: [NTG-context] scripts

2012-11-01 Thread Hans Hagen
On 1-11-2012 11:09, Uwe Koloska wrote: Hello, Am 31.10.2012 00:21, schrieb Hans Hagen: This assumes control over the login shell as well as control over what the launchers of system processes use. I must admit that till now I always assumed some stability in this, which is probably okay as long

Re: [NTG-context] scripts

2012-11-01 Thread Uwe Koloska
Hello, Am 31.10.2012 00:21, schrieb Hans Hagen: > This assumes control over the login shell as well as control over what > the launchers of system processes use. I must admit that till now I > always assumed some stability in this, which is probably okay as long > as one sticks to one specific dis

Re: [NTG-context] Bug in footnote conversion?

2012-11-01 Thread Procházka Lukáš Ing . - Pontex s . r . o .
On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 17:17:06 +0100, Aditya Mahajan wrote: On Wed, 31 Oct 2012, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: You can look if you find something in the manuals or the wiki. If not, then add the information to the wiki. Aditya I added some snippets to existing wiki-pages: http://wiki.contextgar