Re: [NTG-context] two questions on ConTeXt terminology

2014-02-03 Thread Pablo Rodriguez
On 02/03/2014 02:33 PM, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote: > Maybe use „container“, since \start \stop is just like { }. Many thanks for your reply, Hraban. “Containner” seems to generic to me. I meant any \startx \stopx structure. Many thanks for your help, Pablo -- http://www.ousia.tk _

Re: [NTG-context] two questions on ConTeXt terminology

2014-02-03 Thread Pablo Rodriguez
Hi Keith, many thanks for your explanation. I cannot see the “structural” difference ;-) between the start/stop and the begin/end pairs. But I think structure is fine. Structural element seems too complex to me. Many thanks for your help again, Pablo On 02/03/2014 10:07 AM, Keith J. Schultz

Re: [NTG-context] two questions on ConTeXt terminology

2014-02-03 Thread Henning Hraban Ramm
Maybe use „container“, since \start \stop is just like { }. Greetlings, Hraban --- http://www.fiee.net/texnique/ http://wiki.contextgarden.net https://www.cacert.org (I'm an assurer) ___ If your question is of interes

Re: [NTG-context] two questions on ConTeXt terminology

2014-02-03 Thread Keith J. Schultz
Hi Pablo, The start/stop mechanism in ConTeXt is not easy to relate to LaTeX. As the name indicates it means "start/stop doing 'something' "! This "something" can be either equivalent to "Command" or "Enviroment" in LaTeX. e.g: \startbuffer ... \stopbuffer starts storing "things" in a buffer(