My question ist still unclear, I guess?
How to describe it better? Or, if understood, is that not solvable easily?
Thanks for help to make this font completely work with ConTeXt
Huseyin
___
If your question is of
I can change things but will only do that when all you mathematicians
have some agreement about it ...
Otared points out that the distinction between \triangle and
\bigtriangleup comes from plain TeX. plain.tex has these definitions:
\mathchardef\triangle=0234
\mathchardef\bigtriangleup=2234
Dear list, if somebody cares, the following solution works for me:
\hrule
\penalty1
\vfill
\penalty1
\dontleavehmode\framed{...}
\penalty1
\vfill
\penalty1
\hrule height 0pt
\par\penalty-5000
Joshua
Dear list,
I want to have better hyphenated and clickable URLs in my bibliography.
I have defined the following macro:
\define [1] \URL {\goto{\hyphenatedurl{#1}}[url(#1)]}
And I want to use it in the bibliography like that:
\setuppublicationlayout [electronic]
{
\inserturl{ URL:\
Hi,
Is there a command to produce an averaged integral sign ($\int$ with a
slash drawn across it)?
On a related note: It seems to me that \ointclockwise and
\ointctrclockwise produce results opposite to what their names would
indicate.
Thanks,
Janne Junnila
Janne Junnila janne.junn...@gmail.com writes:
On a related note: It seems to me that \ointclockwise and
\ointctrclockwise produce results opposite to what their names would
indicate.
It seems wrong to me as well. It could be a problem in a mapping
internal to context (or maybe the font).
On Mon, 14 Apr 2014, Sanjoy Mahajan wrote:
Janne Junnila janne.junn...@gmail.com writes:
On a related note: It seems to me that \ointclockwise and
\ointctrclockwise produce results opposite to what their names would
indicate.
It seems wrong to me as well. It could be a problem in a mapping
On 4/14/2014 4:22 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Mon, 14 Apr 2014, Sanjoy Mahajan wrote:
Janne Junnila janne.junn...@gmail.com writes:
On a related note: It seems to me that \ointclockwise and
\ointctrclockwise produce results opposite to what their names would
indicate.
It seems wrong to me
Hi typographibians,
for a new project I’m looking for a body font that fits Soviet Modernism.
I’d like to have OpenType, high typographical quality, good readability as body
text, latin and cyrillic glyphs.
Free would be great, but I’d also buy.
Do you have a hint for me?
Greetlings, Hraban
