On Wed, 9 Mar 2016 22:04:53 +0100
L.S.-Soc&Gam wrote:
> i read on TeX exchange that it's best to subscribe to this mailing
> list in order to get help with ConTeXt. but since i only see advanced
> stuff related posts i would like to ask politely if this is the right
> place to ask noob questions
hey Pablo, thanks a lot for pointing some things out. i finally managed
to get mkiv working!!!
Am 09.03.2016 um 23:49 schrieb Pablo Rodriguez:
On 03/09/2016 10:57 PM, L.S.-Soc&Gam wrote:
in TeXnicCenter i added a new profile.
on (La)TeX register i have activated: Run LaTeX in this profile.
in
On Thu, 10 Mar 2016, Peter Rolf wrote:
Am 10.03.2016 um 00:03 schrieb Aditya Mahajan:
The drops module uses the primitive \pdfpxdimen in a couple of places,
but that is no longer defined in the current beta. What is the
equivalent command now?
Examples of usage:
\pdfpxdimen1in\relax\divide\pd
Am 10.03.2016 um 00:03 schrieb Aditya Mahajan:
> The drops module uses the primitive \pdfpxdimen in a couple of places,
> but that is no longer defined in the current beta. What is the
> equivalent command now?
>
> Examples of usage:
>
> \pdfpxdimen1in\relax\divide\pdfpxdimen\numexpr\dropsparamet
On 3/10/2016 12:03 AM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
The drops module uses the primitive \pdfpxdimen in a couple of places,
but that is no longer defined in the current beta. What is the
equivalent command now?
Examples of usage:
\pdfpxdimen1in\relax\divide\pdfpxdimen\numexpr\dropsparameter\c!
resoluti
On Wed, 9 Mar 2016, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
The drops module uses the primitive \pdfpxdimen in a couple of places, but
that is no longer defined in the current beta. What is the equivalent
command now?
Examples of usage:
\pdfpxdimen1in\relax\divide\pdfpxdimen\numexpr\dropsparameter\c!
resolut
The drops module uses the primitive \pdfpxdimen in a couple of places, but
that is no longer defined in the current beta. What is the equivalent
command now?
Examples of usage:
\pdfpxdimen1in\relax\divide\pdfpxdimen\numexpr\dropsparameter\c!
resolution\relax % set actual pixel dimension
Adi
wiki.contextgarden.net/ConTeXt_Standalone is the install page.
On March 9, 2016 1:20:04 PM PST, "L.S.-Soc&Gam" wrote:
>i think it could be of interest to others since it would help to make
>an
>up-to-date installation instruction. many google results seem outdated
>and even on contextgarden the
On 03/09/2016 10:57 PM, L.S.-Soc&Gam wrote:
> i downloaded ConTeXt from contextgarden and so far i saw three options
> to download
>
> first i found folders setup and setup2? which one should i use? in one
> of them there are win32 and win64 zips. and in the other are win32,
> win64 plus a mswi
On 03/09/2016 10:20 PM, L.S.-Soc&Gam wrote:
> i think it could be of interest to others since it would help to make an
> up-to-date installation instruction. many google results seem outdated
> and even on contextgarden there are multiple installation instructions
> that in the end don't help me wi
i downloaded ConTeXt from contextgarden and so far i saw three options
to download
first i found folders setup and setup2? which one should i use? in one
of them there are win32 and win64 zips. and in the other are win32,
win64 plus a mswin zip. which one is the correct one? since i am on
Win
i think it could be of interest to others since it would help to make an
up-to-date installation instruction. many google results seem outdated
and even on contextgarden there are multiple installation instructions
that in the end don't help me with my problems...
ok, so i searched around on c
The wiki at contextgarden.net should be of help.
On March 9, 2016 1:04:53 PM PST, "L.S.-Soc&Gam" wrote:
>hey guys, this is my first mail here so please bear with me.
>
>i read on TeX exchange that it's best to subscribe to this mailing list
>
>in order to get help with ConTeXt. but since i only s
hey guys, this is my first mail here so please bear with me.
i read on TeX exchange that it's best to subscribe to this mailing list
in order to get help with ConTeXt. but since i only see advanced stuff
related posts i would like to ask politely if this is the right place to
ask noob question
Am 2016-03-09 um 22:04 schrieb Andreas Schneider :
> Very good point(s).
>
> Just for more reference:
> We use such forms heavily in-house, sometimes with a multi-stage approach.
> Example: the employee fills out his details, etc., and signs that part. The
> fields he had to fill are now locked
Very good point(s).
Just for more reference:
We use such forms heavily in-house, sometimes with a multi-stage
approach.
Example: the employee fills out his details, etc., and signs that part.
The fields he had to fill are now locked (but saved, ofcourse ;-)). That
PDF is now sent to his or her
On 3/9/2016 4:39 PM, Alan BRASLAU wrote:
One has to be EXTREMELY careful with these "features".
Currently, there are so-called PDF forms, but they are far from fully
functional. I suspect that the specifications are not clear and are not
respected in any case.
which is usually the case with al
One has to be EXTREMELY careful with these "features".
Currently, there are so-called PDF forms, but they are far from fully
functional. I suspect that the specifications are not clear and are not
respected in any case.
I will give a concrete example: The American Tax agency, IRS, provides
a larg
On 3/9/2016 2:11 PM, Andreas Schneider wrote:
Hello all,
is there currently any mechanism in ConTeXt similar to the LaTeX digsig
or eforms package?
I want to add a form field that can be digitally signed (which is now
already possible with Acrobat Reader, not just with Acrobat Pro).
Additionall
Hello all,
is there currently any mechanism in ConTeXt similar to the LaTeX digsig
or eforms package?
I want to add a form field that can be digitally signed (which is now
already possible with Acrobat Reader, not just with Acrobat Pro).
Additionally (like the mentioned eforms package) it wou
20 matches
Mail list logo
