Re: [NTG-context] setupitemgroup and 'command='

2017-05-24 Thread Thomas Floeren
Hans, thanks for your swift reply… > On 24. May 2017, at 19:31, Hans Hagen wrote: > > On 5/24/2017 6:28 PM, Thomas Floeren wrote: >> Hi, >> I used to use the “command=” parameter when setting up itemize. Now I >> noticed that it introduces a spurious horizontal whitespace

Re: [NTG-context] setupitemgroup and 'command='

2017-05-24 Thread Hans Hagen
On 5/24/2017 6:28 PM, Thomas Floeren wrote: Hi, I used to use the “command=” parameter when setting up itemize. Now I noticed that it introduces a spurious horizontal whitespace after the item symbol when the item is of type “\sym{}”. I also noticed that the problem goes away if I use

[NTG-context] setupitemgroup and 'command='

2017-05-24 Thread Thomas Floeren
Hi, I used to use the “command=” parameter when setting up itemize. Now I noticed that it introduces a spurious horizontal whitespace after the item symbol when the item is of type “\sym{}”. I also noticed that the problem goes away if I use “inner=” instead of “command=”. Example:

Re: [NTG-context] issue with signature field

2017-05-24 Thread luigi scarso
On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 9:17 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: > Dear list, > > some time ago, Hans implemented signature fields: > > \setupinteraction[state=start] > \starttext > \definefield[x][signature] > \field[x] > \stoptext > > I’m afraid I’m not able to sign it

Re: [NTG-context] issue with signature field

2017-05-24 Thread Hans Hagen
On 5/21/2017 9:17 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: Dear list, some time ago, Hans implemented signature fields: \setupinteraction[state=start] \starttext \definefield[x][signature] \field[x] \stoptext I’m afraid I’m not able to sign it using Acrobat 9.5.5, which is the