Re: [NTG-context] Strange interaction between mathalignment and mathmatrix

Wow, mathalignment is completely screwed in beta and TL2017.  Hans, please fix! --- \starttext \placeformula \startformula   \startmathalignment[m=2] \NC a^2 + b^2 \NC= c^2 \NC a^2 + b^2 \NC= c^2 \NR   \stopmathalignment \stopformula \stoptext On Tue, 2017-06-06 at 11:06 +1200, Henri

Re: [NTG-context] Strange interaction between mathalignment and mathmatrix

It seems that \NC in mathalignment is looking ahead for the next \NR, because when I wrap the matrix in an explicit brace group it works fine again: \definemathmatrix   [pmatrix]   [left=\left(,right=\right)] \starttext \placeformula \startformula   \startmathalignment \NC \sigma_x \NC=    

[NTG-context] Strange interaction between mathalignment and mathmatrix

Dear list, When I have a mathmatrix inside a mathalignment the numbering using \NR[+] does not work anymore.  Instead it prints "[+]" on the next line.  I guess the definition of \NR from mathmatrix leaks outside.  Affects both TL2017 and latest beta.  MWE is below. Cheers, Henri ---

Re: [NTG-context] Position of prime for derivatives

On 6/4/2017 11:06 PM, Otared Kavian wrote: Hi Mikael, Indeed your observation is correct, but using \over instead of \frac yields the correct behavior. Please try the following sample: %%% begin derivatives-prime-4.tex \setupbodyfont[lucidaot] \starttext Compare the position of the prime

[NTG-context] mathradical defaults to "normal", should it perhaps be "default"?

Hi, this might be a matter of taste. look at the output of (attached). In my opinion the first square root is to "high", while it looks better on the second line. From setup-en.pdf it looks like the default of \setupmathradical is set to normal (and not default). I don't understand what normal

Re: [NTG-context] align inner items vertically

On Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 3:23 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: > On 6/3/2017 6:11 PM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> is it possible to align the inner itemgroup vertically with the outer >> enumeration, even if there is a "big" math expression? See the example >> below (where I have