Re: [NTG-context] roadmap

On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 12:52 AM, Henri Menke wrote: > > Math typesetting is really crappy in ConTeXt > hm -- luigi ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry

Re: [NTG-context] roadmap

On 5/15/2018 12:52 AM, Henri Menke wrote: Math typesetting is really crappy in ConTeXt, but I get that this is beyond your priorities.  I plan to develop a module which resembles the features and syntax of the amsmath LaTeX package for my PhD thesis.  I'm not sure how well this will integrate

Re: [NTG-context] roadmap

On 15/05/18 03:17, Hans Hagen wrote: Hi, The ConTeXt meeting is - as usual - the right place and moment to discuss the roadmap. We never had real binding roadmaps, more informal ones. Anyway, here are some thoughts on the two main components: MkIV and LuaTeX. ConTeXt MkIV: - Check if some

Re: [NTG-context] roadmap

On 5/14/2018 9:36 PM, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote: Hi Hans, thank you so much! Am 2018-05-14 um 17:17 schrieb Hans Hagen : - Get rid of inconsistencies in the user interface e.g. by introducing new commands with settings. +1 - Check what additional features users want

Re: [NTG-context] roadmap

Hi Hans, thank you so much! Am 2018-05-14 um 17:17 schrieb Hans Hagen : > - Get rid of inconsistencies in the user interface e.g. by introducing new > commands with settings. +1 > - Check what additional features users want (miss) and decide to what extent > and with what

[NTG-context] roadmap

Hi, The ConTeXt meeting is - as usual - the right place and moment to discuss the roadmap. We never had real binding roadmaps, more informal ones. Anyway, here are some thoughts on the two main components: MkIV and LuaTeX. ConTeXt MkIV: - Check if some mechanism can (by now) be simplified