Re: [NTG-context] This mailing list is not DKIM (DMARC) compatible

2019-09-16 Thread Henri Menke
I think this is better reported to Mailman. I'm not sure to what extent list administrators have control over DKIM settings. https://gitlab.com/groups/mailman/-/issues On 9/17/19 1:34 AM, Gerben Wierda wrote: > In addition: Lists should keep the From address, the Subject, and the MessageĀ  > total

Re: [NTG-context] formatting index entries: alphabetical order in Unicode

2019-09-16 Thread Robert Zydenbos
> On 13. Sep 2019, at 12:31, luigi scarso wrote: > > > On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 12:20 PM Robert Zydenbos wrote: > > When ConTeXt MkIV (rather: LuaTeX) supports Indic fonts, I'll gladly do that. > :-) > > > luahbtex (in texlive 2020) has harfbuzz embedded . That sounds like *the* solution (

Re: [NTG-context] This mailing list is not DKIM (DMARC) compatible

2019-09-16 Thread Gerben Wierda
In addition: Lists should keep the From address, the Subject, and the Message totally unchanged. They should add a Sender header to indicate their relay role, and set at least the List-Id and List-Unsubscribe headers for mailbox rules and subscription management. Gerben Wierda Chess and the Ar

[NTG-context] This mailing list is not DKIM (DMARC) compatible

2019-09-16 Thread Gerben Wierda
The footer that is added to each message in this list is not DKIM (and thus DMARC) compatible. DKIM requires the ability to create a signature on a set of headers and the body. By changing the body, the DKIM signature fails and the resulting messages sent by the mail list may in the future be bl