Please, can you explain why the result of lmt_outline is shifted to the
right, if I use it in a macro?
"""
\setupbodyfont[ss,24pt]
\definecolor[tshade][t=.05,a=1,k=1]
\starttexdefinition MyCaption #1
\startMPcode
steps := 5 ; % number of shadow layers
rulesize := BodyFontSize/steps/3;
for step
On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 11:19 PM Aditya Mahajan wrote:
>
> On Mon, 26 Jun 2023, Hans Hagen via ntg-context wrote:
>
> > On 6/26/2023 7:53 PM, Aditya Mahajan via ntg-context wrote:
> > > On Mon, 26 Jun 2023, Miguel Diaz via ntg-context wrote:
> > >
> > >> indeed it is a simple simulation of overleaf
On Mon, 26 Jun 2023, Hans Hagen via ntg-context wrote:
> On 6/26/2023 7:53 PM, Aditya Mahajan via ntg-context wrote:
> > On Mon, 26 Jun 2023, Miguel Diaz via ntg-context wrote:
> >
> >> indeed it is a simple simulation of overleaf (for latex).
> >
> > FWIW, context works on overleaf as well!
> >
I've used the following without any troubles for a few years now:
$ cat ~/bin/fontcache
#!/usr/bin/env bash
fc-cache -fv
mtxrun --generate
mtxrun --script fonts --reload
___
If your question is of interest to others a
You’re invited to join on Wednesday, July 12th, 15:00 CEST (UTC+2)
at https://lecture.senfcall.de/hen-rbr-rku-oke
(same, but shorter: https://v34h.de/ctxmtg)
ConTeXt users of all levels are welcome!
This is directly before the TUG/DANTE conference; you can get a preview
of my talk for Bonn ;)
On 7/7/2023 4:51 AM, Max Chernoff wrote:
Hi Hans,
In lpdf-emb.lmt, there's a commented-out definition of
lpdf.registerfontmethod that I'd like to use. I've uncommented this in
my installation and it's worked pretty well for me, so can you please
uncomment/enable this by default in the distributi
On 7/7/2023 1:09 PM, Carlos wrote:
\showmakeup displays it astonishingly correctly indeed
probably a side effect of the fact that injected stuff resynchronizes
the character progression in the pdf file (every char start with
explicit coordinates) while without showing it depends on the width
On Thu, Jul 06, 2023 at 12:57:57PM -0400, Carlos wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 06, 2023 at 09:16:58AM -0400, Carlos wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 06:52:30PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
> > > On 7/5/2023 6:38 PM, Carlos wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 06:12:32PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
> > > > > On