Hi,
On http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Bold_Math section "Mixing Math Fonts"
I tried to mix in the Asana Math font for the missing integral symbols.
0x222B normal integral \int
0x222C double integral \iint
0x222D triple integral \iiint
0x222E contour integral \oint
0x222F surface integral \oiint
0x
Anyone ?
The glyphs are present in the Asana Math font.
-- Forwarded message --
From: gummybears
Date: Thu, May 13, 2010 at 5:03 PM
Subject: Math symbols missing
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users
Hi
The following math symbols are missing,
0x222B normal integral \int
0x222C
Hi,
Running the following test with the latest context (MK-IV 2010.05.13 12:15)
gives the following error.
Compiled fine with version MK-IV 2010.04.29 22:30 (side note : integral
symbols still not displaying correctly)
I was just wondering, is there a ConText test suite which I can use to test
th
Hi
The following math symbols are missing,
0x222B normal integral \int
0x222C double integral \iint
0x222D triple integral \iiint
0x222E contour integral \oint
0x222F surface integral \oiint
0x2230 volume integral \oiiint
I also need the space-time integral \nt (4 i's)
Kind regards
PS Usin
On Sun, 2 May 2010, gummybears wrote:
I read your email (17 april 2010) on the mailing list and applied the two
patches to my Context minimal distro
(the very latest version). When I run your test.tex through context the
preview image test.png is not shown.
>did you recreate formats after pa
Hi Michail,
I read your email (17 april 2010) on the mailing list and applied the two
patches to my Context minimal distro
(the very latest version). When I run your test.tex through context the
preview image test.png
is not shown.
Which version of ConText should I use to make it work
Thanks in
symbol is shifted
to the right and not aligned above the character (hope this make some sense
otherwise
forget it for the moment).
Kind regards
gummybears
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please a
Hi,
How to use definemathcommand to setup some of the missing math symbols ?
Some of these symbols are defined in char-def.lua but missing in
math-vfu.lua.
Thanks
___
If your question is of interest to others as well,
Hi,
In a previous email I commented that the integral symbols, when using the
unicode font Cambria or Asana,
don't look ok. It has to do with the way e.g \iint, \iiint etc are
constructed. Whether or
not the symbol is present in the unicode font, the tex macro \repeatintegral
is used
(fallback opt
@Bernard , thanks for your help, it works.
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage
Hi,
In MK-II the following enumeration worked, sadly in MK-IV they don't. I
browsed the internet,
tried the proclaim "solution" and searched the mailing list for an solution,
found
that several people experiencing the same problem with different numbering
schemes.
Tried several of the proposed sol
Hi,
When using font Cambria, the integral symbols \iint and \iiint look funny
compared to \int.
The contour, surface and volume integrals look fine.
Version ConText version 2010.02.25 19:46.
LuaTeX version 50,0
Test file
\usetypescript[cambria]
\setupbodyfont[cambria]
\starttext
\startformula
\s
With the help of Wolfgang (thanks) the solution is (tested)
\setupformulas[prefix=yes,prefixsegments=chapter:section,way=bysection]
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 10:40 PM, gummybears wrote:
> To all interested
>
> I found a simpler solution, not knowing how prefixsegments really work, but
To all interested
I found a simpler solution, not knowing how prefixsegments really work, but
mainly understand
from this example, is
\setupformulas[prefixsegments=chapter:section]
instead of using
\setupformulas[prefixsegments=1:100]
Both setups gives the same numbering scheme of the formula
Wolfgang, works for me too. Thanks for your time.
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
)
Chapter 1, section 1, formula 2 -> (1.2)
This is not numbered by section but by chapter, as you confirmed.
The problem still persists.
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 6:17 PM, gummybears wrote:
> At Wolfgang
>
> Tried
> \definestructureprefixset[section][section-3][]
> \set
At Wolfgang
Tried
\definestructureprefixset[section][section-3][]
\setupformulas[numbercolor=blue,numberstyle=bold,prefixset=section]
alas it doesn't work.
What version of Context are you using ?
Thanks
___
If your q
lay) by using
\setupnumber[formula][way=bysection] instead of \setupnumbering[way=bysection]
But alas, this does not work either
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 3:47 AM, gummybears wrote:
> Hi,
> A couple of years ago, I decided to switch from LaTex to ConText. Now
> I have compiled a lot
Hi,
A couple of years ago, I decided to switch from LaTex to ConText. Now
I have compiled a lot of documents (Physics syllabi's) which compiles fine
in MK-II.
I thought I would try to make a switch to MK-IV, mainly because I
want to include 3D PRC figures in my documents.
I made some test cases t
In MK-II I use \setupnumbering[way=section] to number math formulae by
section.
What is the equivalent for MK-IV ?
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : nt
In november last year Hans Hagen was so kind to send me a copy of
back-u3d.mkiv which is
now included in the latest beta. As Hans mentioned the code he gave me is
untested.
After a couple of tests here are my findings
*) The preview does not work at this moment. I only see a light blue square
whi
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 5:44 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
> gummybears wrote:
>
>> How to include 3d prc pdf (produced with Asymptote) with Context ?
>>
>
> see the comments in back-u3d.mkiv for an experimental interface
>
File back-u3d.mkiv is not included in the Context di
How to include 3d prc pdf (produced with Asymptote) with Context ?
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/list
23 matches
Mail list logo
