Re: [NTG-context] (resolved) m-letter backslash codes in xml database

2005-01-17 Thread Hans Hagen
Adam Lindsay wrote: Rob Ermers said this at Sun, 16 Jan 2005 11:12:24 +0100: Introducing scedilla in the file, as you suggested, seems not necessary: Ba soka. Right. You've figured this out, but in case anyone else was following along, Hans's element-based solution used ConTeXt's internal glyph n

Re: [NTG-context] (resolved) m-letter backslash codes in xml database

2005-01-16 Thread Adam Lindsay
Rob Ermers said this at Sun, 16 Jan 2005 11:12:24 +0100: >Introducing scedilla in the file, as you suggested, seems not necessary: >Ba soka. Right. You've figured this out, but in case anyone else was following along, Hans's element-based solution used ConTeXt's internal glyph names (very extensi

Re: [NTG-context] (resolved) m-letter backslash codes in xml database

2005-01-16 Thread Rob Ermers
Thanks Adam, Now Hans' suggestions work. They are a bit lengthy, but I don't really care for now. They are preferred to a number. For searching purposes in the database, it is possible to introduce separate labels without diacritics. Introducing scedilla in the file, as you suggested, seems not