Hi Yannis,
I had recently a new MacBook Pro (my good old PowerBook was stolen…)
and so I installed MacOS X 10.5 on my Intel based MacBook.
I confirm that I cannot run LuaTeX (actually I never could run
anything other than very simple ConTeXt mkii files with luatex…).
Following up the discussi
On Dec 25, 2007 11:13 AM, Yannis Haralambous
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Le 24 déc. 07 à 21h50, Taco Hoekwater a écrit :
>
>
> Something changed from 10.4 to 10.5
> I spent 30 minutes installing 10.5 and after ten minutes decided to return
> to 10.4 (which took me a few hours).
> Nothing worked
Le 24 déc. 07 à 21h50, Taco Hoekwater a écrit :
Something changed from 10.4 to 10.5
I spent 30 minutes installing 10.5 and after ten minutes decided to
return to 10.4 (which took me a few hours).
Nothing worked anymore, neither X, nor Classic. And to install Time
Machine I needed twice the
Jjgod Jiang wrote:
>
> I just checked out the latest luatex source from svn, with
> the following patch, luatex builds fine on 10.5:
Thank you very much. Patch applied to trunk.
Best wishes,
Taco
___
If your question
Hi Taco,
On Mon, 24 Dec 2007, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
> Perhaps not any more in 10.5? Something changed from 10.4 to 10.5 that
> broke luatex's build process. Just the building though, pre-compiled
> binaries work fine. What exactly has changed is a mystery so far.
You're right, I think it has been
Jjgod Jiang wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Dec 2007, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
it on OSX? On linux it's ...
>>> Should'nt this discssion go to the dev-luatex list? :-)
>> But did not CC the list himself. :-)
>>
>> This: http://www.hmug.org/man/2/sigaltstack.php
>>
>> looks like a Mac OS X manual page. How
On Fri, 21 Dec 2007, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
>>> it on OSX? On linux it's ...
>>
>> Should'nt this discssion go to the dev-luatex list? :-)
>
> But did not CC the list himself. :-)
>
> This: http://www.hmug.org/man/2/sigaltstack.php
>
> looks like a Mac OS X manual page. However, Thomas reported
