2011/1/8 Khaled Hosny :
> On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 07:25:42AM +0100, Martin Schröder wrote:
>> qpdf is MUCH better...
>
> I take your word on this, but out of curiosity, better in what sense?
pdfopt is ghostscript, that is the pdf is fed into a PostScript RIP,
which spits out linearized pdf.
qpdf
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 07:25:42AM +0100, Martin Schröder wrote:
> 2011/1/5 Khaled Hosny :
> > On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 10:35:46PM +0100, luigi scarso wrote:
> >> "Fast Web View : Yes"
> >> How did you done with mkiv ?
> >
> > pdfopt from GS?
>
> qpdf is MUCH better...
I take your word on this, bu
On 01/06/2011 07:25 AM, Martin Schröder wrote:
2011/1/5 Khaled Hosny:
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 10:35:46PM +0100, luigi scarso wrote:
"Fast Web View : Yes"
How did you done with mkiv ?
pdfopt from GS?
qpdf is MUCH better...
Thanks, Martin, good tip.
Jano
__
On 6-1-2011 10:37, Martin Schröder wrote:
2011/1/6 Hans Hagen:
\usemodule[fnt-31]
And what magic generates the linearized pdf?
probably a "save as"
Hans
-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
2011/1/6 Hans Hagen :
> \usemodule[fnt-31]
And what magic generates the linearized pdf?
Best
Martin
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@n
On 6-1-2011 12:55, luigi scarso wrote:
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 10:52 PM, Khaled Hosny wrote:
http://texnik.dante.de/misc/PTSerif.pdf
"Fast Web View : Yes"
How did you done with mkiv ?
pdfopt from GS?
http://texnik.dante.de/misc/PTSerif.pdf
seems to be done with context directly, without post
2011/1/6 luigi scarso :
> http://texnik.dante.de/misc/PTSerif.pdf
> seems to be done with context directly, without postprocessing with
> ghostscript
luatex can not generate linearized pdf directly.
Best
Martin
__
2011/1/5 Khaled Hosny :
> On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 10:35:46PM +0100, luigi scarso wrote:
>> "Fast Web View : Yes"
>> How did you done with mkiv ?
>
> pdfopt from GS?
qpdf is MUCH better...
Best
Martin
___
If your qu
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 10:52 PM, Khaled Hosny wrote:
>> > http://texnik.dante.de/misc/PTSerif.pdf
>> "Fast Web View : Yes"
>> How did you done with mkiv ?
>
> pdfopt from GS?
http://texnik.dante.de/misc/PTSerif.pdf
seems to be done with context directly, without postprocessing with ghostscript
--
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 10:35:46PM +0100, luigi scarso wrote:
> 2011/1/5 Herbert Voss :
> > Am 05.01.2011 19:57, schrieb luigi scarso:
> >> http://www.pro-linux.de/news/1/16560/freie-schrift-pt-serif-veroeffentlicht.html
> >> http://www.paratype.com/public/
> >>
> >> What do you think ?
> >
> > her
2011/1/5 Herbert Voss :
> Am 05.01.2011 19:57, schrieb luigi scarso:
>> http://www.pro-linux.de/news/1/16560/freie-schrift-pt-serif-veroeffentlicht.html
>> http://www.paratype.com/public/
>>
>> What do you think ?
>
> her is a list of the glyphs created by Volker
>
> http://texnik.dante.de/misc/PTS
> thanks, should go now
Indeed. Thanks!
Arthur
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/nt
Am 05.01.2011 21:43, schrieb Arthur Reutenauer:
>> her is a list of the glyphs created by Volker
>>
>> http://texnik.dante.de/misc/PTSerif.pdf
>
> ERROR 403: Forbidden. Is it somehow intentional, or an oversight?
sigh ...
thanks, should go now
Herbert
_
> her is a list of the glyphs created by Volker
>
> http://texnik.dante.de/misc/PTSerif.pdf
ERROR 403: Forbidden. Is it somehow intentional, or an oversight?
Arthur
___
If your question is of interest to o
Hi Luigi,
On 2011-01-05 <19:57:35>, luigi scarso wrote:
> http://www.pro-linux.de/news/1/16560/freie-schrift-pt-serif-veroeffentlicht.html
> http://www.paratype.com/public/
>
> What do you think ?
impressive coverage of contemporary alphabets, matching
sans/serif is nice too. The serif bold fac
Am 05.01.2011 19:57, schrieb luigi scarso:
> http://www.pro-linux.de/news/1/16560/freie-schrift-pt-serif-veroeffentlicht.html
> http://www.paratype.com/public/
>
> What do you think ?
her is a list of the glyphs created by Volker
http://texnik.dante.de/misc/PTSerif.pdf
Herbert
_
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 19:57, luigi scarso wrote:
> http://www.pro-linux.de/news/1/16560/freie-schrift-pt-serif-veroeffentlicht.html
> http://www.paratype.com/public/
>
> What do you think ?
I've already used PT Sans for some documents. It's a really nice font
in my amateur opinion. However, I wa
http://www.pro-linux.de/news/1/16560/freie-schrift-pt-serif-veroeffentlicht.html
http://www.paratype.com/public/
What do you think ?
--
luigi
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry
18 matches
Mail list logo