Re: [NTG-context] [ppchtex] \normalifx: Undefined control sequence

2010-04-23 Thread Denis Bitouzé
Le vendredi 23/04/10 à 09h34, Hans Hagen a écrit : > we have context mkii and context mkiv; the new ppchtex module is for > mkiv and uses a combination of lua, tex and mp; as context and latex > are quite different (and even more when you consider mkiv) the new > ppchtex code targets at context

Re: [NTG-context] [ppchtex] \normalifx: Undefined control sequence

2010-04-23 Thread Hans Hagen
On 23-4-2010 7:37, Denis Bitouzé wrote: Le jeudi 22/04/10 à 23h32, Hans Hagen a écrit : btw, in mkiv ppchtex is reimplemented; it still has some flaws but it has more room for extensions and is now part of the context mkiv kernel As I'm not using ConTeXt for the moment (but it may change! :)

Re: [NTG-context] [ppchtex] \normalifx: Undefined control sequence

2010-04-22 Thread Denis Bitouzé
Le jeudi 22/04/10 à 23h30, Hans Hagen a écrit : > sure, in the ppchtex manual; indeed {}{} is used inline (in math mode > or not) and [][] between start/stop pairs Well, sorry for my misreading... -- Denis ___ If

Re: [NTG-context] [ppchtex] \normalifx: Undefined control sequence

2010-04-22 Thread Denis Bitouzé
Le jeudi 22/04/10 à 23h32, Hans Hagen a écrit : > btw, in mkiv ppchtex is reimplemented; it still has some flaws but it > has more room for extensions and is now part of the context mkiv > kernel As I'm not using ConTeXt for the moment (but it may change! :), what are the consequences of this f

Re: [NTG-context] [ppchtex] \normalifx: Undefined control sequence

2010-04-22 Thread Hans Hagen
On 22-4-2010 7:09, Denis Bitouzé wrote: Are those changes: 1. {}{} rather than [][], 2. pair \startchemical, \stopchemical or not, 3. etc. btw, in mkiv ppchtex is reimplemented; it still has some flaws but it has more room for extensions and is now part of the context mkiv kernel

Re: [NTG-context] [ppchtex] \normalifx: Undefined control sequence

2010-04-22 Thread Hans Hagen
On 22-4-2010 7:09, Denis Bitouzé wrote: Are those changes: 1. {}{} rather than [][], 2. pair \startchemical, \stopchemical or not, 3. etc. documented somewhere? sure, in the ppchtex manual; indeed {}{} is used inline (in math mode or not) and [][] between start/stop pairs Hans

Re: [NTG-context] [ppchtex] \normalifx: Undefined control sequence

2010-04-22 Thread Denis Bitouzé
Le jeudi 22/04/10 à 16h51, Denis Bitouzé a écrit : > But the following MCE: > > \documentclass{article} > \usepackage{etex,m-pictex,m-ch-en} > \begin{document} > \startchemical > \chemical[2H_2,PLUS,O_2,GIVES,2H_2O] > \stopchemical > \end{document} > > leads to the messages: > [...] Well, the

Re: [NTG-context] [ppchtex] \normalifx: Undefined control sequence

2010-04-22 Thread Denis Bitouzé
Le jeudi 22/04/10 à 16h42, Hans Hagen a écrit : > so use the [][] variant instead ({}{} is for inline) OK, that's better :) But the following MCE: \documentclass{article} \usepackage{etex,m-pictex,m-ch-en} \begin{document} \startchemical \chemical[2H_2,PLUS,O_2,GIVES,2H_2O] \stopchemical \end{d

Re: [NTG-context] [ppchtex] \normalifx: Undefined control sequence

2010-04-22 Thread Hans Hagen
On 22-4-2010 3:30, Denis Bitouzé wrote: Le jeudi 22/04/10 à 15h21, Denis Bitouzé a écrit : no compilation trouble Sorry, no error but the following message in the .log file: ppchtex: the {}{}-alternative is not permitted here so use the [][] variant instead ({}{} is for inline) --

Re: [NTG-context] [ppchtex] \normalifx: Undefined control sequence

2010-04-22 Thread Denis Bitouzé
Le jeudi 22/04/10 à 15h21, Denis Bitouzé a écrit : > no compilation trouble Sorry, no error but the following message in the .log file: ppchtex: the {}{}-alternative is not permitted here -- Denis ___ If

Re: [NTG-context] [ppchtex] \normalifx: Undefined control sequence

2010-04-22 Thread Denis Bitouzé
Le jeudi 22/04/10 à 13h41, Hans Hagen a écrit : > can you download the cont-tmf.zip file and unzip it in the texmd-dist > root? It works! Well almost: no compilation trouble, but an empty page with the following MCE: \documentclass{article} \usepackage{etex,m-pictex,m-ch-en} \begin{document} \s

Re: [NTG-context] [ppchtex] \normalifx: Undefined control sequence

2010-04-22 Thread Hans Hagen
On 22-4-2010 11:30, Denis Bitouzé wrote: Le dimanche 18/04/10 à 23h23, Hans Hagen a écrit : can you check if your ppchtex.noc file has \input supp-mis.mkii \let\writestatus\undefined \input syst-gen.mkii \input syst-fnt.mkii i.e loads the mkii files? Yes, those lines are present in the fil

Re: [NTG-context] [ppchtex] \normalifx: Undefined control sequence

2010-04-22 Thread Denis Bitouzé
Le dimanche 18/04/10 à 23h23, Hans Hagen a écrit : > can you check if your ppchtex.noc file has > > \input supp-mis.mkii \let\writestatus\undefined > \input syst-gen.mkii > \input syst-fnt.mkii > > i.e loads the mkii files? Yes, those lines are present in the file ppchtex.noc: [bito...@drums

Re: [NTG-context] [ppchtex] \normalifx: Undefined control sequence

2010-04-18 Thread Hans Hagen
On 17-4-2010 11:10, Denis Bitouzé wrote: Hello, thanks to contributors of this list I was able to use ppchtex with LaTeX when I encountered a "\writestatus: Undefined control sequence" problem: http://www.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/2009/044672.html Everything went well (though I have a littl

[NTG-context] [ppchtex] \normalifx: Undefined control sequence

2010-04-17 Thread Denis Bitouzé
Hello, thanks to contributors of this list I was able to use ppchtex with LaTeX when I encountered a "\writestatus: Undefined control sequence" problem: http://www.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/2009/044672.html Everything went well (though I have a little use of ppchtex) but, as I tried it some d