Re: [NTG-context] [tex-live] difference texlive 2008, 2009

2010-02-16 Thread Aditya Mahajan
On Tue, 16 Feb 2010, Lubos Kolouch wrote: Pardon my ignorance, does it mean, I have to run it after every update of this package? You need to run source /opt/context-minimals/setuptex once on each terminal from which you want to run context. If you do not use texlive, then you can add

Re: [NTG-context] [tex-live] difference texlive 2008, 2009

2010-02-15 Thread Aditya Mahajan
On Mon, 15 Feb 2010, Lubos Kolouch wrote: I can, however it was already discussed here in this thread and fixed once... You can try the same solution again :) source /opt/context-minimals/setuptex minimal file : http://dpaste.com/159433/ log: http://dpaste.com/159432/ Notice that the

Re: [NTG-context] [tex-live] difference texlive 2008, 2009

2010-02-15 Thread Lubos Kolouch
Aditya Mahajan, Mon, 15 Feb 2010 12:29:58 -0500: On Mon, 15 Feb 2010, Lubos Kolouch wrote: I can, however it was already discussed here in this thread and fixed once... You can try the same solution again :) source /opt/context-minimals/setuptex minimal file :

Re: [NTG-context] [tex-live] difference texlive 2008, 2009

2010-02-12 Thread Lubos Kolouch
Taco Hoekwater, Fri, 12 Feb 2010 08:33:27 +0100: Lubos Kolouch wrote: Aditya Mahajan, Sun, 10 Jan 2010 04:46:54 -0500: On Sun, 10 Jan 2010, Lubos Kolouch wrote: Thank you for the investigation, I will open a ticket with the buggy (Archlinux) texlive package. You can also my

Re: [NTG-context] [tex-live] difference texlive 2008, 2009

2010-02-12 Thread Aditya Mahajan
On Fri, 12 Feb 2010, Lubos Kolouch wrote: Sorry... the package installs fine, however the output is wrong again (the text is behind/below the flag, not right to it) Can you attach a minimal example and the log file? Aditya

Re: [NTG-context] [tex-live] difference texlive 2008, 2009

2010-02-11 Thread Lubos Kolouch
Aditya Mahajan, Sun, 10 Jan 2010 04:46:54 -0500: On Sun, 10 Jan 2010, Lubos Kolouch wrote: Thank you for the investigation, I will open a ticket with the buggy (Archlinux) texlive package. You can also my context-minimals-git package for Archlinux:

Re: [NTG-context] [tex-live] difference texlive 2008, 2009

2010-02-11 Thread Taco Hoekwater
Lubos Kolouch wrote: Aditya Mahajan, Sun, 10 Jan 2010 04:46:54 -0500: On Sun, 10 Jan 2010, Lubos Kolouch wrote: Thank you for the investigation, I will open a ticket with the buggy (Archlinux) texlive package. You can also my context-minimals-git package for Archlinux:

Re: [NTG-context] [tex-live] difference texlive 2008, 2009

2010-02-11 Thread Aditya Mahajan
On Fri, 12 Feb 2010, Lubos Kolouch wrote: Aditya Mahajan, Sun, 10 Jan 2010 04:46:54 -0500: On Sun, 10 Jan 2010, Lubos Kolouch wrote: Thank you for the investigation, I will open a ticket with the buggy (Archlinux) texlive package. You can also my context-minimals-git package for

Re: [NTG-context] [tex-live] difference texlive 2008, 2009

2010-01-13 Thread Lubos Kolouch
Aditya Mahajan, Sun, 10 Jan 2010 04:46:54 -0500: On Sun, 10 Jan 2010, Lubos Kolouch wrote: Thank you for the investigation, I will open a ticket with the buggy (Archlinux) texlive package. You can also my context-minimals-git package for Archlinux:

Re: [NTG-context] [tex-live] difference texlive 2008, 2009

2010-01-13 Thread Vedran Miletić
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 3:21 PM, Lubos Kolouch lubos.kolo...@gmail.com wrote: Aditya Mahajan, Sun, 10 Jan 2010 04:46:54 -0500: On Sun, 10 Jan 2010, Lubos Kolouch wrote: Thank you for the investigation, I will open a ticket with the buggy (Archlinux) texlive package. You can also my

Re: [NTG-context] [tex-live] difference texlive 2008, 2009

2010-01-13 Thread Lubos Kolouch
Vedran Miletić, Wed, 13 Jan 2010 18:02:02 +0100: On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 3:21 PM, Lubos Kolouch lubos.kolo...@gmail.com wrote: Aditya Mahajan, Sun, 10 Jan 2010 04:46:54 -0500: On Sun, 10 Jan 2010, Lubos Kolouch wrote: Thank you for the investigation, I will open a ticket with the buggy

Re: [NTG-context] [tex-live] difference texlive 2008, 2009

2010-01-13 Thread Vedran Miletić
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 6:20 PM, Lubos Kolouch lubos.kolo...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks, after pressing Enter twice (in two cases) I could install the package, however the output is still wrong :( That's a bug in ConTeXt then, likely. Regards, -- Vedran Miletić

Re: [NTG-context] [tex-live] difference texlive 2008, 2009

2010-01-13 Thread Aditya Mahajan
On Wed, 13 Jan 2010, Lubos Kolouch wrote: Aditya Mahajan, Sun, 10 Jan 2010 04:46:54 -0500: On Sun, 10 Jan 2010, Lubos Kolouch wrote: Thank you for the investigation, I will open a ticket with the buggy (Archlinux) texlive package. You can also my context-minimals-git package for

Re: [NTG-context] [tex-live] difference texlive 2008, 2009

2010-01-13 Thread Lubos Kolouch
Aditya Mahajan, Wed, 13 Jan 2010 13:18:55 -0500: On Wed, 13 Jan 2010, Lubos Kolouch wrote: Aditya Mahajan, Sun, 10 Jan 2010 04:46:54 -0500: On Sun, 10 Jan 2010, Lubos Kolouch wrote: Thank you for the investigation, I will open a ticket with the buggy (Archlinux) texlive package. You

Re: [NTG-context] [tex-live] difference texlive 2008, 2009

2010-01-10 Thread Lubos Kolouch
Taco Hoekwater, Sat, 09 Jan 2010 11:51:27 +0100: Lubos Kolouch wrote: Hello, (sorry for posting to wrong group first). Output looks ok here with the latest context release, so it could be a bug in the context included in texlive. The probable cause is that \newline does not switch to

Re: [NTG-context] [tex-live] difference texlive 2008, 2009

2010-01-10 Thread Taco Hoekwater
Lubos Kolouch wrote: Taco Hoekwater, Sat, 09 Jan 2010 11:51:27 +0100: Lubos Kolouch wrote: Hello, (sorry for posting to wrong group first). Output looks ok here with the latest context release, so it could be a bug in the context included in texlive. The probable cause is that \newline does

Re: [NTG-context] [tex-live] difference texlive 2008, 2009

2010-01-10 Thread Aditya Mahajan
On Sun, 10 Jan 2010, Lubos Kolouch wrote: Thank you for the investigation, I will open a ticket with the buggy (Archlinux) texlive package. You can also my context-minimals-git package for Archlinux: http://www.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/2009/043743.html which installs the latest

Re: [NTG-context] [tex-live] difference texlive 2008, 2009

2010-01-09 Thread Lubos Kolouch
Hello, (sorry for posting to wrong group first). \setupoutput [pdftex] \enableregime[utf] \usetypescript [modern][ec] \setupbodyfont [ss,10pt] \mainlanguage[en] \setuppapersize [A4][A4] \setupcolors [state=start] \setuppagenumber [state=stop] \starttext

Re: [NTG-context] [tex-live] difference texlive 2008, 2009

2010-01-09 Thread Taco Hoekwater
Lubos Kolouch wrote: Hello, (sorry for posting to wrong group first). Output looks ok here with the latest context release, so it could be a bug in the context included in texlive. The probable cause is that \newline does not switch to horizontal mode like it should, so an extra space before

Re: [NTG-context] [tex-live] difference texlive 2008, 2009

2010-01-08 Thread Taco Hoekwater
Lubos Kolouch wrote: Hello, I have a strange problem and I am not sure what causes it. This is a context question, redirecting to the mailing list. (we will still need a small test file, though) Best wishes, Taco When I run texlive on one of my .tex files in Gentoo (texlive-2008),