On 5/21/2013 11:35 PM, Romain Diss wrote:
We've already got \setdigitmode, \setdigitorder, and \setdigitspace;
it might make sense to create a \setupdigits to consolidate these
setups into one interface. Something like this:
\setupdigits
[mode=4, % --\setdigitmode{4}
Le mercredi 22 mai 2013, Hans Hagen a écrit :
On 5/21/2013 11:35 PM, Romain Diss wrote:
We've already got \setdigitmode, \setdigitorder, and \setdigitspace;
it might make sense to create a \setupdigits to consolidate these
setups into one interface. Something like this:
\setupdigits
Hi,
is it possible to change the behaviour of \digits to have \cdot as in
http://www.pragma-ade.com/general/magazines/mag-0003.pdf page 2 (table at
the bottom) instead of \times as shown in the latest units-mkiv-document
http://www.pragma-ade.com/general/manuals/units-mkiv.pdf pages 67?
Thanks
Le lundi 20 mai 2013, Christian Prim a écrit :
is it possible to change the behaviour of \digits to have \cdot as in
http://www.pragma-ade.com/general/magazines/mag-0003.pdf page 2 (table at
the bottom) instead of \times as shown in the latest units-mkiv-document
On 5/21/2013 11:44 AM, Romain Diss wrote:
Le lundi 20 mai 2013, Christian Prim a écrit :
is it possible to change the behaviour of \digits to have \cdot as in
http://www.pragma-ade.com/general/magazines/mag-0003.pdf page 2 (table at
the bottom) instead of \times as shown in the latest
Thanks for the tip Hans,
but the kerning in
\def\digitstimessymbol{\kern.**2\emwidth\cdot\kern.2\emwidth}
should not take place in mathmode, only in textmode. Else the space is too
big. Don't know how to deal with that.
Christian
2013/5/21 Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl
On 5/21/2013 11:44 AM,
On 5/21/2013 5:15 PM, Christian Prim wrote:
Thanks for the tip Hans,
but the kerning in
\def\digitstimessymbol{\kern.__2\emwidth\cdot\kern.2\emwidth} should not
take place in mathmode, only in textmode. Else the space is too big.
Don't know how to deal with that.
Now it's perfect! Will this be included in the next version of context?
Christian
2013/5/21 Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl
On 5/21/2013 5:15 PM, Christian Prim wrote:
Thanks for the tip Hans,
but the kerning in
\def\digitstimessymbol{\kern._**_2\emwidth\cdot\kern.2\**emwidth} should
not
Hi Hans,
Christian Prim wrote:
is it possible to change the behaviour of \digits to have \cdot [...]
instead of \times [...]?
Hans wrote:
there are several ways we can deal with this: [...]
or maybe a key/value in setuptimes .. not sure yet
We've already got \setdigitmode, \setdigitorder,
We've already got \setdigitmode, \setdigitorder, and \setdigitspace;
it might make sense to create a \setupdigits to consolidate these
setups into one interface. Something like this:
\setupdigits
[mode=4, % --\setdigitmode{4}
% (decimal period,
Am 09.06.2011 23:16, schrieb Wolfgang Schuster:
I guess the \pm has to be in $$. If I type
\NN (30$\pm$3)e-3
there's 'e-3' in the pdf-file again. The \NN somewhere between the digit
only creates a big space (new column).
Sorry for being so slow on the uptake.
The \NN column expects a
Hi,
I'm using the digit-module and enjoy, that I get a nice output using the
following:
\starttext
\digits{30e-3}
\stoptext
instead of
\starttext
$30 \cdot 10^{-3}$ or $30 ⋅ 10^{-3}$
\stoptext
But now I'm wondering why this module does not work in the
tabulate-environment with:
Am 09.06.2011 um 22:24 schrieb yoraxe:
Hi,
I'm using the digit-module and enjoy, that I get a nice output using the
following:
\starttext
\digits{30e-3}
\stoptext
instead of
\starttext
$30 \cdot 10^{-3}$ or $30 ⋅ 10^{-3}$
\stoptext
But now I'm wondering why this module does
Am 09.06.2011 22:31, schrieb Wolfgang Schuster:
Am 09.06.2011 um 22:24 schrieb yoraxe:
Hi,
I'm using the digit-module and enjoy, that I get a nice output using the
following:
\starttext
\digits{30e-3}
\stoptext
instead of
\starttext
$30 \cdot 10^{-3}$ or $30 ⋅ 10^{-3}$
Am 09.06.2011 um 23:00 schrieb yoraxe:
Thanks. That was very easy. But where do I have to put the \NN when I use
something like
(30 \pm 3)e-3
?
The \NN command is place of the \NC command and adding another one will only
start a new column.
I guess the \pm has to be in $$. If I type
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 5:04 PM, Wolfgang Schuster
schuster.wolfg...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
the \digits command cause a error message with the last beta in MkIV.
% engine=luatex
\starttext
\digits{1.000}
\stoptext
! \textfont 1 is undefined (character :).
\mathematics #1-\relax
Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 5:04 PM, Wolfgang Schuster
schuster.wolfg...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
the \digits command cause a error message with the last beta in MkIV.
This took much more longer than it should. In supp-num.tex, there is
this definition:
Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 5:04 PM, Wolfgang Schuster
schuster.wolfg...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
the \digits command cause a error message with the last beta in MkIV.
This took much more longer than it should. In supp-num.tex, there is
this
At 19:59 29/08/2003 +0200, you wrote:
Hello,
while browsing the source, I came across the very nice \digits
macro.
But I have some comments: In my opinion some characters don't look right
\starttext
\digits 123.222,= % short, OK
\digits 123.222,== % should be em dash (?)
\digits
Hello,
while browsing the source, I came across the very nice \digits
macro.
But I have some comments: In my opinion some characters don't look right
\starttext
\digits 123.222,= % short, OK
\digits 123.222,== % should be em dash (?)
\digits +123.222,22% OK
\digits -123.222,33
20 matches
Mail list logo