On 12-6-2010 11:09, Hans Hagen wrote:
Ideally, it should be done the other way around, fake U+21A6 in Latin
Modern virtual font and then use the proper code point everywhere (may
be this what is actually done but I misinterpreted it).
indeed the idea is to have only the right unicode chars
Hi!
I use $x↦2x$ in xits, and it prints x→2x instead of x↦2x. The same file
works with latin modern. It seems that xits-math contains U+21A6 (↦) symbol
(at least, kcharselect displays this character in xits-math font), so it
should be related to some meta-information.
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 01:19:08PM +0400, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote:
Hi!
I use $x↦2x$ in xits, and it prints x→2x instead of x↦2x. The same file
works with latin modern. It seems that xits-math contains U+21A6 (↦) symbol
(at least, kcharselect displays this character in xits-math font), so
Khaled Hosny wrote:
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 01:19:08PM +0400, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote:
Hi!
I use $x↦2x$ in xits, and it prints x→2x instead of x↦2x. The same file
works with latin modern. It seems that xits-math contains U+21A6 (↦)
symbol (at least, kcharselect displays this character in
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 09:07:17PM +0400, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote:
Khaled Hosny wrote:
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 01:19:08PM +0400, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote:
Hi!
I use $x↦2x$ in xits, and it prints x→2x instead of x↦2x. The same file
works with latin modern. It seems that xits-math
On 12-6-2010 5:22, Khaled Hosny wrote:
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 01:19:08PM +0400, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote:
Hi!
I use $x↦2x$ in xits, and it prints x→2x instead of x↦2x. The same file
works with latin modern. It seems that xits-math contains U+21A6 (↦) symbol
(at least, kcharselect displays
