On 1/23/2013 11:10 AM, Otared Kavian wrote:
Thanks to Hans and Wolfgang for your attention and the workarounds you offer.
When I want to refer to an un-numbered section, it makes sense in an
interactive document. Maybe, instead of
\in{other section}[sec:other]
I should use another comm
On 23 janv. 2013, at 09:38, Hans Hagen wrote:
> As there are indeed side effects I'll remove that options. Asking for a
> number of an unnumbered section is weird anyway.
>
Hi,
Thanks to Hans and Wolfgang for your attention and the workarounds you offer.
When I want to refer to an un-numbere
On 2013–01–23 Hans Hagen wrote:
> >IIRC this was a feature request a while ago, the macros to print ?? and !!
> >are defined as
I'm the one to blame!
> >
> >\def\dummyreference{{\tttf ??}}
> >\def\wrongreference{{\tttf !!}}
>
> As there are indeed side effects I'll remove that options.
I hope
On 1/23/2013 9:38 AM, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 1/23/2013 9:12 AM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 23.01.2013 um 08:39 schrieb Otared Kavian :
Hi Hans,
I noticed that with the latest mkiv (version 2013.01.22 18:33 MKIV
fmt: 2013.1.22) when the sections have no numbers two « ! » are
printed and this b
On 1/23/2013 9:12 AM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 23.01.2013 um 08:39 schrieb Otared Kavian :
Hi Hans,
I noticed that with the latest mkiv (version 2013.01.22 18:33 MKIV fmt:
2013.1.22) when the sections have no numbers two « ! » are printed and this
behavior is new: with previous versions
Am 23.01.2013 um 08:39 schrieb Otared Kavian :
> Hi Hans,
>
> I noticed that with the latest mkiv (version 2013.01.22 18:33 MKIV fmt:
> 2013.1.22) when the sections have no numbers two « ! » are printed and this
> behavior is new: with previous versions when invoking for instance
> \in{
Hi Hans,
I noticed that with the latest mkiv (version 2013.01.22 18:33 MKIV fmt:
2013.1.22) when the sections have no numbers two « ! » are printed and this
behavior is new: with previous versions when invoking for instance
\in{other section}[sec:other]
there used to be a link to the "o
