Fabrice Couvreur schrieb am 05.08.2020 um 19:33:
Hello,
I also use a square to complete a demonstration. I tried this without
success
Thank you
Fabrice
\definesymbol[Fin][\mathematics{\square}]
\def\qed{\strut\wordright{\symbol[Fin]}}
\defineenumeration
[proof]
[...,
closesymbol={\s
Hello,
I also use a square to complete a demonstration. I tried this without
success
Thank you
Fabrice
\definesymbol[Fin][\mathematics{\square}]
\def\qed{\strut\wordright{\symbol[Fin]}}
\defineenumeration
[proof]
[text=Démonstration,
alternative=serried,
distance=\zeropoint,
number=n
Hi Hans,
Thanks for the hint which consists in adding an \ifmmode to the definition of
\qed.
However, as you suggest, one needs some other mechanism in math mode, since
with your new definition of \qed the alignment of the formula changes when one
adds this close symbol:
begin-example-qed
On 8/3/2020 10:10 PM, Otared Kavian wrote:
Hi Hans,
A file which used to be typeset correctly with the previous versions of lmtx,
now produces an error. Despite the error message being extremely cryptic:
Error ! Missing number, treated as zero
I could guess the origin of the bug, which s
Hi Hans,
A file which used to be typeset correctly with the previous versions of lmtx,
now produces an error. Despite the error message being extremely cryptic:
Error ! Missing number, treated as zero
I could guess the origin of the bug, which seems to be \wordright, but
although the fol
