Re: [NTG-context] Can't compile LuaTeX beta 0.35.0 (on OS X)

2009-03-01 Thread Mojca Miklavec
(Answering with a bit of delay.) On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 13:06, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote: > > On Feb 25, 2009, at 12:24 PM, Taco Hoekwater wrote: > >> She surely would have done so already if we hadn't all told her to >> 'brake a leg' in Bohinj. :) >> >> Best wishes, >> Taco > > Oops, is Mojca ill?

Re: [NTG-context] Can't compile LuaTeX beta 0.35.0 (on OS X)

2009-02-26 Thread Alan Stone
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 12:15 PM, Thomas A. Schmitz < thomas.schm...@uni-bonn.de> wrote: > > > It compiles normally here (10.5.6, Intel). Hasn't Mojca added the binary to > the minimals? We really should cut her bonus at the end of the year :-) Mojca, if I may, a precious tip regarding your end

Re: [NTG-context] Can't compile LuaTeX beta 0.35.0 (on OS X)

2009-02-25 Thread Alan BRASLAU
On Wednesday 25 February 2009 15:32:02 Mojca Miklavec wrote: > Next problem is that I'm now away (with extremely limited internet > access), Taco and Hans are leaving as well ... What, you are all leaving us stranded? > I kind of expect a few problems. "current" will probably break now - I > doub

Re: [NTG-context] Can't compile LuaTeX beta 0.35.0 (on OS X)

2009-02-25 Thread Mojca Miklavec
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 12:15, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote: > > On Feb 24, 2009, at 8:48 PM, Andreas Harder wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> if I try to compile the actual LuaTeX beta, the compilation ends with the >> following error: >> >> ld: in ../../libs/luasocket/src/socket.a, archive has no table of cont

Re: [NTG-context] Can't compile LuaTeX beta 0.35.0 (on OS X)

2009-02-25 Thread luigi scarso
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 1:06 PM, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote: > > On Feb 25, 2009, at 12:24 PM, Taco Hoekwater wrote: > >> She surely would have done so already if we hadn't all told her to >> 'brake a leg' in Bohinj. :) >> >> Best wishes, >> Taco > > Oops, is Mojca ill? Anyway, I see that the linux m

Re: [NTG-context] Can't compile LuaTeX beta 0.35.0 (on OS X)

2009-02-25 Thread Thomas A. Schmitz
On Feb 25, 2009, at 12:24 PM, Taco Hoekwater wrote: She surely would have done so already if we hadn't all told her to 'brake a leg' in Bohinj. :) Best wishes, Taco Oops, is Mojca ill? Anyway, I see that the linux minimals now have the 0.35 luatex. Would anything speak against updating the

Re: [NTG-context] Can't compile LuaTeX beta 0.35.0 (on OS X)

2009-02-25 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Am 25.02.2009 um 12:15 schrieb Thomas A. Schmitz: It compiles normally here (10.5.6, Intel). Hasn't Mojca added the binary to the minimals? I don't think so, the last stable release needs 0.31.3. Wolfgang ___ I

Re: [NTG-context] Can't compile LuaTeX beta 0.35.0 (on OS X)

2009-02-25 Thread Taco Hoekwater
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote: >> > It compiles normally here (10.5.6, Intel). Hasn't Mojca added the binary > to the minimals? We really should cut her bonus at the end of the year :-) She surely would have done so already if we hadn't all told her to 'brake a leg' in Bohinj. :) Best wishes, Taco __

Re: [NTG-context] Can't compile LuaTeX beta 0.35.0 (on OS X)

2009-02-25 Thread luigi scarso
> It compiles normally here (10.5.6, Intel). Hasn't Mojca added the binary to > the minimals? We really should cut her bonus at the end of the year :-) and raise the fixed -- luigi ___ If your question is of inte

Re: [NTG-context] Can't compile LuaTeX beta 0.35.0 (on OS X)

2009-02-25 Thread Thomas A. Schmitz
On Feb 24, 2009, at 8:48 PM, Andreas Harder wrote: Hello, if I try to compile the actual LuaTeX beta, the compilation ends with the following error: ld: in ../../libs/luasocket/src/socket.a, archive has no table of contents collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make: *** [luatex] Error 1

[NTG-context] Can't compile LuaTeX beta 0.35.0 (on OS X)

2009-02-25 Thread Andreas Harder
Hello, if I try to compile the actual LuaTeX beta, the compilation ends with the following error: ld: in ../../libs/luasocket/src/socket.a, archive has no table of contents collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make: *** [luatex] Error 1 I'm on Mac OS X 10.5.6 (Intel) and checked out the source