On 2013–09–26 Peter Münster wrote:
On Thu, Sep 26 2013, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
Wouldn't it be better to move the manuals to github rather than keeping them
on an svn server?
Why?
In my opinion, for the “3 commits per year” it doesn't really matter
which version control system is being
On Fri, Sep 27 2013, Marco Patzer wrote:
More importantly I would like to see people actually contributing.
+1
And it would be no problem for me (and for other contextman members) to
apply contributed patches. Whoever wants to contribute without worrying
about the VCS can send a patch here.
On 2013–09–21 Marco Patzer wrote:
I did not have the ConTeXt manual source code on hand, so I could
not directly modify it.
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Improving_the_manuals
Do not count on someone else to fix it. Create an account and fix
what you think could be improved,
Hi,
I registered an account, but have not seen any confirmation.
Kindest regards.
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Marco Patzer li...@homerow.info wrote:
On 2013–09–21 Marco Patzer wrote:
I did not have the ConTeXt manual source code on hand, so I could
not directly modify it.
On Thu, 26 Sep 2013, Thangalin wrote:
Hi,
I registered an account, but have not seen any confirmation.
Kindest regards.
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Marco Patzer li...@homerow.info wrote:
On 2013–09–21 Marco Patzer wrote:
I did not have the ConTeXt manual source code on hand, so I
On 2013–09–26 Thangalin wrote:
I registered an account, but have not seen any confirmation.
Supelec has problems with the mail system at the moment. So Taco
doesn't get a notification if someone requests commit access. I cc'd
him, so he should get notified that way. In case you still don't get
On 2013–09–26 Aditya Mahajan wrote:
Wouldn't it be better to move the manuals to github rather than
keeping them on an svn server?
+1
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
If your question is of
On Thu, Sep 26 2013, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
Wouldn't it be better to move the manuals to github rather than keeping them
on an svn server?
Why?
--
Peter
___
If your question is of interest to others as
@Peter github makes collaboration quite painless. Users can manage their
own accounts.
+1 for github from me too!
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 1:42 PM, Peter Münster pmli...@free.fr wrote:
On Thu, Sep 26 2013, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
Wouldn't it be better to move the manuals to github rather than
+π from me.
My preference would be BitBucket (slightly simpler than github and allows
for free private repositories), but, either way, the result is the same:
fewer steps to updating the manual. Moving away from svn to git is also a
step in the right direction, IMO.
One aspect of wikis that I
On 2013–09–18 Thangalin wrote:
Hi Dave,
During a recent plane ride, I started to read the ConTeXt manual
to get a better understanding:
http://www.ctex.org/documents/context/cont-enp.pdf
A more recent manual can be found at
http://pmrb.free.fr/contextref.pdf
If anyone has plans to
Hi,
During a recent plane ride, I started to read the ConTeXt manual to get a
better understanding: http://www.ctex.org/documents/context/cont-enp.pdf
If anyone has plans to revise it, I have attached a file with corrections,
specific comments, and general comments. I did not have the ConTeXt
Hello,
Where can I find the lastest version of ConTeXt the manual.
Mine is november 12, 2001
Maybe there are better manuals today. Can you tell me please where I can
find them.
Thank you.
___
If your question is
Am 2008-06-18 um 16:36 schrieb TeXWorld:
Where can I find the lastest version of ConTeXt the manual.
Mine is november 12, 2001
Maybe there are better manuals today. Can you tell me please where I
can
find them.
Hello Nobody,
this is a FAQ: No, there's no newer manual. What you got is
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 9:53 PM, Alan Stone
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I intend to print the
http://www.pragma-ade.com/general/manuals/cont-enp.pdf
manual ( dated 2001.11.12 ).
However, before proceeding...
Is there's an updated version available ?
No but it should be still valid.
Wolfgang
Ok thanks Wolfgang.
One request though to the person/people who makes the manual(s)...
Could you please refrain from using any background color on some pages of
the print version because it unnecessarily pumps precious ink/toner from the
cartridge.
Would be *much* appreciated.
Thanks on
At 07:23 AM 6/11/2008, Hans wrote:
hm, more recent manuals tend to use even more color ...
And it is useful for people who view the pages on the screen
or want to print a given page in color. (When I print a
big manual, I use my laser printer which does not have
color rather than my inkjet
hm, more recent manuals tend to use even more color ...
Good for HP, Epson, ..., cartridge manufacturers and resellers.
Not for our wallets.
Besides this detail... very well written manual though! ;O)
Best,
Alan
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 1:23 PM, Hans Hagen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alan
I intend to print the
http://www.pragma-ade.com/general/manuals/cont-enp.pdf
manual ( dated 2001.11.12 ).
However, before proceeding...
Is there's an updated version available ?
Thanks,
Alan
___
If your question is
Are the sources for the ConTeXt manuals publicly available?
If not, are you willing to show how the beautiful contents and section
headings are defined for ConTeXt: the manual?
Thanks.
-Tom
___
If your question is
This?
http://context.aanhet.net/svn/
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 9:25 PM, Browder, Tom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Are the sources for the ConTeXt manuals publicly available?
If not, are you willing to show how the beautiful contents and section
headings are defined for ConTeXt: the manual?
Are the sources for the ConTeXt manuals publicly available?
If not, are you willing to show how the beautiful title page, contents,
and section headings are defined for ConTeXt: the manual?
Thanks.
-Tom
___
If your
22 matches
Mail list logo
