Hello,
I was looking into simplefonts
(http://wiki.contextgarden.net/simplefonts) and noticed the clause
if you’re running ConTeXt Standalone
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/ConTeXt_Standalone (which is a better
option)
Well I'm using TeXLive, but am happy to take good advice, so I looked at
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Lars Huttar wrote:
The other issue for me with Standalone is that the only version listed
for Windows is W32TeX. When I go to the web page for that platform, I
don't see any information about what W32TeX is; just how to install it.
It sounds like it's specific
On Thu, 24 Oct 2013 14:57:35 +0200
Mojca Miklavec mojca.miklavec.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Lars Huttar wrote:
The other issue for me with Standalone is that the only version
listed for Windows is W32TeX. When I go to the web page for that
platform, I don't
On Thu, 24 Oct 2013, Lars Huttar wrote:
Hello,
I was looking into simplefonts
(http://wiki.contextgarden.net/simplefonts) and noticed the clause
if you’re running ConTeXt Standalone
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/ConTeXt_Standalone (which is a better
option)
Well I'm using TeXLive, but am
The problem with Standalone is that the full range of fonts found with
Texlive is not available. Standalone has 258 otf fonts and TexLive
has 508 otf fonts. So I am opting for TeXLive, although I have both.
I use standalone in parallel with texlive (which I need for latex). In the
Arch
Am 24.10.2013 um 16:18 schrieb Aditya Mahajan adit...@umich.edu:
Another dfficulty is that many of the examples for simplefonts
are apparently developed on a Windows system and I use Linux. Font
names are different.
I haven't had any trouble with using simplefonts in Linux (but then, I
