On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 02:37:33PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 19-7-2011 12:46, luigi scarso wrote:
> >On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 12:41 PM, John Haltiwanger
> > wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 3:27 AM, Martin Schröder wrote:
> >>>
> >>>2011/7/19 Cecil Westerhof:
> When you find th
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 19-7-2011 12:46, luigi scarso wrote:
>> I don't know haskell, but it sound like a good excuse to start.
>
> it might be way easier to convert the xml export to pandoc because then
> users can still define commands (like special sectioning); o
On 19-7-2011 12:46, luigi scarso wrote:
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 12:41 PM, John Haltiwanger
wrote:
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 3:27 AM, Martin Schröder wrote:
2011/7/19 Cecil Westerhof:
When you find them, I would be interested in them. And maybe I can
improve
on them.
Pandoc. :-)
Pandoc
2011/7/19 luigi scarso
> > Pandoc does not support Context as an input. Nor does it support modern
> mkIV
> > conventions (\startchapter..\stopchapter; \hyphenatedURL; etc).
> > If anyone knows Haskell, maybe we can submit some patches to Pandoc to
> > create a --mkiv switch for Context?
> I don'
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 12:41 PM, John Haltiwanger
wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 3:27 AM, Martin Schröder wrote:
>>
>> 2011/7/19 Cecil Westerhof :
>> > When you find them, I would be interested in them. And maybe I can
>> > improve
>> > on them.
>>
>>
>> Pandoc. :-)
>
> Pandoc does not sup
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 3:27 AM, Martin Schröder wrote:
> 2011/7/19 Cecil Westerhof :
> > When you find them, I would be interested in them. And maybe I can
> improve
> > on them.
>
>
Pandoc. :-)
>
Pandoc does not support Context as an input. Nor does it support modern mkIV
conventions (\startch
2011/7/19 Cecil Westerhof :
> When you find them, I would be interested in them. And maybe I can improve
> on them.
Pandoc. :-)
Best
Martin
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry
2011/7/18 Aditya Mahajan
> On Thu, 14 Jul 2011, John Haltiwanger wrote:
>
> PS. For what it is worth, I do not think it would be _too_ hard to create
>> a
>> Context to Markdown translator.
>>
>
> Yes. A while back I did some tests (though I cannot find them now), and had
> most of the basic Con
On Thu, 14 Jul 2011, John Haltiwanger wrote:
PS. For what it is worth, I do not think it would be _too_ hard to create a
Context to Markdown translator.
Yes. A while back I did some tests (though I cannot find them now), and
had most of the basic ConTeXt-to-markdown working (sections, blockqu
