Sietse wrote:
>> Alpha particles are \lohi[left]{40}{2}He.
Alain wrote:
> Someone needs to fix the wiki... (done!)
[Alain fixed the wiki to "Alpha particles are \lohi[left]{4}{2}He\high{2+}."]
But, but, but ... that doesn't demonstrate the fact that the elements
right-align instead of left-align
Le jeudi 18 octobre 2012, Alan BRASLAU a écrit :
> By the way, \lohi[left]{2}{4}He is somewhat a tautology, like all such
> isotopic nomenclature, as He ALWAYS has an atomic number of 2,
> otherwise it is not He (and U ALWAYS has an atomic number of 92,
> otherwise it is no longer U).
Sure but but
Le jeudi 18 octobre 2012, Sietse Brouwer a écrit :
> What about \lohi with the [left] key? That might serve your needs until
> Alan gets \chemistry to parse and typeset isotopes correctly.
Yes there are some "hacks" to typeset isotopes correctly, but I think it would
be better to be able to typese
On Thu, 18 Oct 2012 10:41:00 +0200
Sietse Brouwer wrote:
> Alpha particles are \lohi[left]{40}{2}He.
Alpha particles are He\high{2+} (helium nucleus)
not to be confused with He\low{2} (helium molecules)
that DO exist but are unstable and only last 13 seconds or so.
Someone needs to fix the wiki
On 18-10-2012 00:20, Romain Diss wrote:
Le mercredi 17 octobre 2012, Alan BRASLAU a écrit :
Furiously, "breaking" many old curiosities,
fixing broken and incomplete functionality,
AND completely re-writing the documentation!
(Not that I really know much about chemistry myself... :)
Since you ta
On Thu, 18 Oct 2012 00:20:01 +0200
Romain Diss wrote:
> Le mercredi 17 octobre 2012, Alan BRASLAU a écrit :
> > Furiously, "breaking" many old curiosities,
> > fixing broken and incomplete functionality,
> > AND completely re-writing the documentation!
> > (Not that I really know much about chemi
Le mercredi 17 octobre 2012, Alan BRASLAU a écrit :
> Furiously, "breaking" many old curiosities,
> fixing broken and incomplete functionality,
> AND completely re-writing the documentation!
> (Not that I really know much about chemistry myself... :)
Since you talk about chemistry, is there now a w
On Wed, 17 Oct 2012 22:52:33 +0200
Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 17-10-2012 21:30, Marco Pessotto wrote:
>
> > Some things, like the chemical stuff, require someone who actually
> > does know what they are (I don't).
>
> Alan is currently reviewing the chemical subsystem.
Furiously, "breaking" many o
