On 7/22/2015 11:33 PM, tala...@fastmail.fm wrote:
Dear Pablo,
Thank you very much for what you proposed — it did work indeed. I tried to
achieve the same at some length this afternoon. I think I understand what is
going on in the first macro, but wouldn’t have been able to arrive at the the
On 07/22/2015 11:33 PM, tala...@fastmail.fm wrote:
> Dear Pablo,
>
> Thank you very much for what you proposed — it did work indeed. I
> tried to achieve the same at some length this afternoon. I think I
> understand what is going on in the first macro, but wouldn’t have been
> able to arrive at t
Dear Pablo,
Thank you very much for what you proposed — it did work indeed. I tried to
achieve the same at some length this afternoon. I think I understand what is
going on in the first macro, but wouldn’t have been able to arrive at the the
second one for \variant, or the counter (and still d
On 07/22/2015 09:26 PM, Talal wrote:
> [...]
> I would like to be able to automate (through macros) the making of a
> critical apparatus' note. This is for two reasons. First, the body text
> and the lemma in the note below should be identical: as such, they
> ideally not have to be typed twice, as
Hans Hagen wxs.nl> writes:
> > Actually ranges have always been supported ...
> > Maybe I should add those commands.
> > Hans
Picking up on an old thread, again.
The document below lays out the three basic parts of a critical
apparatus of a critical edition of a text: (1) the body text; (2)
[If this is considered too off-topic for this list, please ignore this
mail. My main point has still something to do with ConTeXt, but I guess
this discussion shouldn't be continued on the list.]
On 07/22/2012 08:07 PM, Pablo Rodríguez wrote:
And to explain that a bit: it's not merely "ugly." If
On 20/07/12 20:21, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
> [...]
> And to explain that a bit: it's not merely "ugly." If all you want is
> the printed book, you don't care about the ugliness and simply code this
> way to get the desired output. However, we are in the 21st century. We
> should be beyond the p
On 20/07/12 22:41, Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 20-7-2012 20:21, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
>> [...]
>> And to explain that a bit: it's not merely "ugly." If all you want is
>> the printed book, you don't care about the ugliness and simply code this
>> way to get the desired output. However, we are in the
On 20-7-2012 20:21, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
On 07/20/2012 08:01 PM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Hans speaks about something like this
\startone
…
\starttwo
…
\stopone
…
\stopone
where environment ranges overlap.
And to explain that a bit: it's not merely "ugly." If all you want is
the printed
On 07/20/2012 08:01 PM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Hans speaks about something like this
\startone
…
\starttwo
…
\stopone
…
\stopone
where environment ranges overlap.
And to explain that a bit: it's not merely "ugly." If all you want is
the printed book, you don't care about the ugliness and s
On 20/07/12 17:41, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
> Just a few comments on this helpful mail:
Thank you very much for your reply, Thomas.
> On 07/19/2012 12:57 PM, MANUEL GONZALEZ SUAREZ wrote:
>> I'm not a classical philologist, but the way ConTeXt works is much
>> clearer than ledmac to me (although
Am 20.07.2012 um 19:33 schrieb Sietse Brouwer:
> Hans wrote:
>> but as you mention the interface is a bit problematic as start/stop is not
>> nice when being nested
>
> Do you mean it doesn't look nice, or is it so that nesting or
> interleaving \startlinenote[tag] ... \stoplinenote[tag] enviro
I'm trying to get straight in my head what critical-edition-related
commands are already implemented in ConTeXt.
Implemented:
(a) footnotes on specific lines, specified inline: \linenote{note text}
(b) ditto on line ranges: \startlinenote[tag]{note text} ... \stoplinenote[tag]
(c) tag a line and r
On 07/20/2012 06:45 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
Actually ranges have always been supported (as we needed in the previous
century already for referring to passages in texts where students had to
comment on):
Yes, that's something I forgot in my mail: ask on the list, and chances
are that it has alrea
On 20-7-2012 17:41, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
This may be a bit more difficult, because it involves thinking about
proper input syntax. How do you want to mark this passage? If you can
come up with clean and unequivocal syntax and demonstrate it in an
example, your chances aren't too bad. However
Just a few comments on this helpful mail:
On 07/19/2012 12:57 PM, MANUEL GONZALEZ SUAREZ wrote:
I'm not a classical philologist, but the way ConTeXt works is much
clearer than ledmac to me (although I have only tested ledmac for a
couple of days).
I haven't looked at ledmac too closely, and of
Hi Pablo..Thanks for your quick response. The truth is that I am very, very newbie working with ConTeXt (in fact I know only a few months) but I think the possibilities are extraordinary for all kinds of documents.The issue of critical issues is fairly well resolved in LaTeX with "ledmac", but I th
On 18/07/12 12:09, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
> On 7/18/12 10:10 AM, MANUEL GONZALEZ SUAREZ wrote:
>> Hey.
>> First, thanks to Andreas for his solution to the bibliographies.
>> Second, a question: is there a module to produce critical editions with
>> ConTeXt? In critical editions usually have sever
On 7/18/12 10:10 AM, MANUEL GONZALEZ SUAREZ wrote:
Hey.
First, thanks to Andreas for his solution to the bibliographies.
Second, a question: is there a module to produce critical editions with
ConTeXt? In critical editions usually have several groups of footnotes
and reference is usually made by
Hey. First, thanks to Andreas for his solution to the bibliographies. Second, a question: is there a module to produce critical editions with ConTeXt? In critical editions usually have several groups of footnotes and reference is usually made by line number. With LaTeX can be done using "ledmac", b
20 matches
Mail list logo
