[NTG-context] Did usage of \expanded changed?

2012-05-11 Thread Peter Schorsch
Hi, I reactivated some code that was working a year ago. But now it seems that \expanded has no effect in my case (see below). I also tried it with \normalexpanded and \expandedafter but both had also no effect. My problem seems to be this line of the full example below:

Re: [NTG-context] Did usage of \expanded changed?

2012-05-11 Thread Thomas A. Schmitz
On 05/11/2012 01:28 PM, Peter Schorsch wrote: Hi, I reactivated some code that was working a year ago. But now it seems that \expanded has no effect in my case (see below). I also tried it with \normalexpanded and \expandedafter but both had also no effect. My problem seems to be this line of

Re: [NTG-context] Did usage of \expanded changed?

2012-05-11 Thread Peter Schorsch
See this thread: http://archive.contextgarden.net/message/20120402.144627.e46a9f9f.en.html and try to construct a minimal example next time. I converted my number to counter and shrinked my example - but the problem still occurs: Instead of the counter value when I set the reference I get

Re: [NTG-context] Did usage of \expanded changed?

2012-05-11 Thread Hans Hagen
On 11-5-2012 16:59, Peter Schorsch wrote: \unprotect \definecounter[ParagraphCounter][way=bysection,prefix=no] \def\markParagraph[#1]% {\getrawparameters[Paragraph][mark=,#1]% \incrementcounter[ParagraphCounter]%