Hans Hagen schrieb:
Peter Rolf wrote:
Hi Hans,
Looks like I'm the only one using resource libs. I have tried to solve
the problem with figure inclusion, but my lua is still too bad
(coroutines). At least I have found the place where things go wrong.
function
Peter Rolf wrote:
Hi Hans,
Looks like I'm the only one using resource libs. I have tried to solve
the problem with figure inclusion, but my lua is still too bad
(coroutines). At least I have found the place where things go wrong.
function figures.bases.find(basename,askedlabel)
[..]
Hi Hans,
Looks like I'm the only one using resource libs. I have tried to solve
the problem with figure inclusion, but my lua is still too bad
(coroutines). At least I have found the place where things go wrong.
function figures.bases.find(basename,askedlabel)
[..]
if base[2] and
David Arnold wrote:
My workaround was to rename the second instance \externalfigure
[sec4foura], but I am wondering a bit about this mechanism.
You really should use unique names for your figures, you know.
How else can you differentiate between the one in section 4
and the one in section 2?
All,
I have chapter1.tex:
\startproduct chapter1
\project book
\startbodymatter
\setupheadnumber[chapter][0]
\chapter[chap:1]{Functions}
\component chapter1/section1
\component chapter1/section2
\component chapter1/section3
\component chapter1/section4
\stopbodymatter
\stopproduct
Willi Egger wrote:
Hi Hans,
It seems that the figurelibrary mechanism is (still, previous post on
19-9-2005) broken.
TeXExec 5.4.3 - ConTeXt / PRAGMA ADE 1997-2005
texexec : TeXExec 5.4.3 - ConTeXt / PRAGMA ADE 1997-2005
texutil : TeXUtil 9.0.0 - ConTeXt /
Hans Hagen wrote:
Willi Egger wrote:
Hi Hans,
It seems that the figurelibrary mechanism is (still, previous post on
19-9-2005) broken.
TeXExec 5.4.3 - ConTeXt / PRAGMA ADE 1997-2005
texexec : TeXExec 5.4.3 - ConTeXt / PRAGMA ADE 1997-2005
texutil : TeXUtil
Hm,
Strange, I have no duplicate tree-segments. I have the distro in the
texmf-local tree.
Even after reextractign the file I downloaded yesterday en regenerating
the formats I get the same result except that the format gets the date
of 20 march.
Willi
Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Hans Hagen
Hi Hans,
of course, this will happen of list.
Willi
Hans Hagen wrote:
Willi Egger wrote:
Hi Hans,
It seems that the figurelibrary mechanism is (still, previous post on
19-9-2005) broken.
TeXExec 5.4.3 - ConTeXt / PRAGMA ADE 1997-2005
texexec : TeXExec 5.4.3 - ConTeXt /
Willi Egger wrote:
Hi Hans,
It seems that the figurelibrary mechanism is (still, previous post on
19-9-2005) broken.
TeXExec 5.4.3 - ConTeXt / PRAGMA ADE 1997-2005
texexec : TeXExec 5.4.3 - ConTeXt / PRAGMA ADE 1997-2005
texutil : TeXUtil 9.0.0 - ConTeXt /
Hi Hans,
Thank you for asking for the whole set of files. While looking for them
I detected that the xml file was gone. Then a new set of files was
prepared . Testing those however revealed that everything worked to
expectation!
Sorry for the noise!
Willi
Hans Hagen wrote:
Willi Egger
Hi David,
yes you can. In your doc you can refer to the library's content either
by symbolic names as given in the library or by reference to a page in
the library
\usemodule[fig-base]
\usefigurebase[mylibrary]
.
{\externalfigure[mynicepicture][...]}
.
Am 2006-01-15 um 04:15 schrieb David Arnold:
After you run:
figures $ texexec --pdf --use=fig-make --mode=letter
figlibSection3.xml
are the figures embedded in figlibSection3.pdf? That is, could you
now remove the files used to create figlibSection3.pdf?
If you see them in the PDF,
13 matches
Mail list logo