[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> This version runs the ruby scripts directly, rather than the suggested
> form, e.g., "texfmstart pstopdf.rb file.ps". I have no idea if that
> is intended to work -- it did in my very simple tests . I'm not sure
> the RUBYLIB line is needed.
>
when you use texmfstart
There are two classes of users:
1) most error messages are ignored up to and including the ones that
promise global thermonuclear war if you click on "Yes", or
2) minor warnings bring all work to a halt until explained.
In honor of the latter class, who ask about the suggestion to use
"texstart
