Hello!
That was it, I forgot rule one: update your ConTeXt before asking
questions. I updated to newest current and everything started working.
Thank you,
Mari
On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 2:59 PM Wolfgang Schuster
wrote:
>
> Hi Mari,
>
> you have to update your installation because fontawesome 5 uses
Hi Mari,
you have to update your installation because fontawesome 5 uses a new
machanism
to load the symbols from the font files. The first version of the
mechanism from August
did only work when you enabled the symbol set for the whole document and
extended
support was added in September.
W
Mari Voipio schrieb am 01.11.18 um 12:04:
Hi,
I'm trying to get Font Awesome 5 to work for me, but it only almost does.
Wolfgang's code works and I get a nice list of symbols for all three
variations, so ConTeXt obviously finds the font. But when I try to use
a single symbol, ConTeXt prints the
Hi,
I'm trying to get Font Awesome 5 to work for me, but it only almost does.
Wolfgang's code works and I get a nice list of symbols for all three
variations, so ConTeXt obviously finds the font. But when I try to use
a single symbol, ConTeXt prints the symbol name instead of the symbol.
There mu
On Sun, 7 Oct 2018, Ulrike Fischer wrote:
Am Sun, 7 Oct 2018 09:26:11 -0400 (EDT) schrieb Aditya Mahajan:
Would it make sense to update the fonts in the distribution?
I didn't quite follow the discussion and the suggested code, but
from a similar discussion for latex I know that the symbols
Am Sun, 7 Oct 2018 09:26:11 -0400 (EDT) schrieb Aditya Mahajan:
> Would it make sense to update the fonts in the distribution?
I didn't quite follow the discussion and the suggested code, but
from a similar discussion for latex I know that the symbols in
fontawesome 4 and 5 looks different (that'
On 10/7/2018 5:25 PM, Alan Braslau wrote:
On Sun, 7 Oct 2018 16:19:13 +0200
Hans Hagen wrote:
hm, one of these projects that when it got some reasonable user base
went 'pro', collects money as kick start which looks proffitable enough
to keep all open, but then goes for a limited free version
On 10/7/2018 5:39 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Sun, 7 Oct 2018, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
This sounds reasonable. Could we add these definitions to
symb-imp-fontawesome?
sure
-
Hans Hagen
On Sun, 7 Oct 2018, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Aditya Mahajan schrieb am 07.10.18 um 15:26:
Hi,
There is a FontAwesome.otf file that is distributed with ConTeXt
minimals. Does anyone know what version (4 or 5) of the font it is? I am
asking because the names of the symbols used in the font do
On Sun, 7 Oct 2018 16:19:13 +0200
Hans Hagen wrote:
> hm, one of these projects that when it got some reasonable user base
> went 'pro', collects money as kick start which looks proffitable enough
> to keep all open, but then goes for a limited free version to play nice,
> and go for a subscri
On 10/7/2018 3:43 PM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Aditya Mahajan schrieb am 07.10.18 um 15:26:
Hi,
There is a FontAwesome.otf file that is distributed with ConTeXt
minimals. Does anyone know what version (4 or 5) of the font it is? I
am asking because the names of the symbols used in the font
Aditya Mahajan schrieb am 07.10.18 um 15:26:
Hi,
There is a FontAwesome.otf file that is distributed with ConTeXt
minimals. Does anyone know what version (4 or 5) of the font it is? I
am asking because the names of the symbols used in the font do not
match those on the font-awesome website.
Hi,
There is a FontAwesome.otf file that is distributed with ConTeXt minimals.
Does anyone know what version (4 or 5) of the font it is? I am asking
because the names of the symbols used in the font do not match those on
the font-awesome website. For example, using
\showsymbolset[fontawesome
13 matches
Mail list logo
