On Jun 1, 2006, at 3:16 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 6/1/06, Hans Hagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks, that was a very interesting read! Personally, if it weren't
>>> for the really bad tex installation, I would favor gentoo over most
>>> other linux di
On 6/1/06, Hans Hagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
>
> > Thanks, that was a very interesting read! Personally, if it weren't
> > for the really bad tex installation, I would favor gentoo over most
> > other linux distros I have tried (the new SUSE 10.1 is a disaster,
> >
>
Jean Magnan de Bornier wrote:
> Le 01 juin � 13:44:33 Hans Hagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> �crit notamment:
>
>
> [...]
>
>
>
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/38615
>>> Thanks, that was a very interesting read! Personally, if it weren't
>>> for the
Le 01 juin à 13:44:33 Hans Hagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> écrit notamment:
[...]
>>>
>>> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/38615
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Thanks, that was a very interesting read! Personally, if it weren't
>> for the really bad tex installation, I would favor gentoo over
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
> On Jun 1, 2006, at 11:15 AM, Jean Magnan de Bornier wrote:
>
>
>> Yes, there has been an interesting piece of information on this point:
>>
>> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/38615
>>
>>
>
> Thanks, that was a very interesting read! Personally, i
On Jun 1, 2006, at 11:15 AM, Jean Magnan de Bornier wrote:
> Yes, there has been an interesting piece of information on this point:
>
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/38615
>
Thanks, that was a very interesting read! Personally, if it weren't
for the really bad tex installat
Le 01 juin à 09:56:46 "Thomas A. Schmitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
écrit notamment:
| On Jun 1, 2006, at 5:52 AM, Jean Magnan de Bornier wrote:
>
| > Hmm, no: gentoo is distro where every package is optimally
| > *compiled* by
| > your machine, and tetex version right now is " 3.0_p1-r3"
| >
| > che
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
> On Jun 1, 2006, at 5:52 AM, Jean Magnan de Bornier wrote:
>
> That's not quite right: if you run the stable gentoo branch, you get
> version 2.0.2-r8.
As we have seen in BachoTeX this year, for ConTeXt users this is
simply worthless.
Taco
On Jun 1, 2006, at 5:52 AM, Jean Magnan de Bornier wrote:
> Hmm, no: gentoo is distro where every package is optimally
> *compiled* by
> your machine, and tetex version right now is " 3.0_p1-r3"
>
> cheers
> --
> Jean
That's not quite right: if you run the stable gentoo branch, you get
vers
Le 31 mai à 23:51:44 Renaud AUBIN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> écrit notamment:
| I don't know well gentoo but I believe that this distro is based on
| debian stable => tetex 2
Hmm, no: gentoo is distro where every package is optimally *compiled* by
your machine, and tetex version right now is " 3.0_p1-r3"
I don't know well gentoo but I believe that this distro is based on
debian stable => tetex 2
Jean Magnan de Bornier a écrit :
>
>Renaud: I looked at the page about a debian install, it should be easy to
>adapt this to other distros, like gentoo for instance which has up to date
>tetex versions.
Le 31 mai à 19:09:41 nico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> écrit notamment:
| On Wed, 31 May 2006 15:21:15 +0200, Jean Magnan de Bornier
| <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
| > Le 31 mai à 14:30:33 Jean Magnan de Bornier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> écrit
| > notamment:
| >
| > | but with the pdf option I get something
On Wed, 31 May 2006 15:21:15 +0200, Jean Magnan de Bornier
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Le 31 mai à 14:30:33 Jean Magnan de Bornier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> écrit
> notamment:
>
> | but with the pdf option I get something unexpected:
>
> And here's what texexec says about that:
> ..
There is apparently a big problem in your installation but you already
known that... I have not used
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/TeTeX_3.0_installation since I use debian
(apt-get rules). Consequently, we are on the bounds of my knowledge on
this problem...
I assume you need LaTeX (like me :( ),
Le 31 mai à 14:30:33 Jean Magnan de Bornier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> écrit notamment:
| but with the pdf option I get something unexpected:
And here's what texexec says about that:
..
Warning: pdfetex (file /usr/local/teTeX/share/texmf-local/fonts/map/dvipdfm/con
text/original-
Can you upload the pdf on a website (instead of the ML)?
IMHO, problems with accentuated chars can come from the use of
heterogeneous encodings (emacs unicode + context ec for example as I
experienced). Check the encoding of your input file with "file
test.tex", if you get something like "ISO-8859
Le 31 mai à 13:33:18 Hans Hagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> écrit notamment:
| Jean Magnan de Bornier wrote:
| > Hi all,
| > On a fresh installed done following (very exactly)
| >
| > http://wiki.contextgarden.net/TeTeX_3.0_installation,
| >
| > I get the following message with this :
| > ..
Sorry for my first post, I have misunderstood the problem...
I have checked your example with texexec --dvi + viewing it in xdvi: no
problem at all...
The complete log to see what happened:
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/ConTeXt/temp$ texexec --d
Jean Magnan de Bornier wrote:
> Hi all,
> On a fresh installed done following (very exactly)
>
> http://wiki.contextgarden.net/TeTeX_3.0_installation,
>
> I get the following message with this :
> .
> \starttext
> �
> \oe \"a
> \stoptext
> .
Hi Jean,
Your example works here...
I'm not a font guru but it is maybe more interesting for you to use
type1 fonts. Depending on which linux distro you use, you have to tell
tetex to use type1. On my debian testing box, I have uncommented "Map
lm.map" in /etc/texmf/updmap.d/10tetex-base.cfg and
Hi all,
On a fresh installed done following (very exactly)
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/TeTeX_3.0_installation,
I get the following message with this :
.
\starttext
àéèçù
\oe \"a
\stoptext
.
kpathsea: Running mktexpk --mfmode / --bdpi 600
21 matches
Mail list logo