[NTG-context] Fwd: Re: xml-processing: missing or ungrouped '='

2011-01-08 Thread Achim Jander
Am 07.01.2011 22:52, schrieb Hans Hagen: On 7-1-2011 7:04, Achim Jander wrote: \startxmlsetups xml:title \startchapter[ \xmlcommand{#1}{.}{xml:splitHeader} title=... Thanks. So it seems not to be possible, to have the whatever= part inside an xmlcommand? I even tried things like \xmld

Re: [NTG-context] Fwd: Re: xml-processing: missing or ungrouped '='

2011-01-08 Thread Hans Hagen
On 8-1-2011 11:20, Achim Jander wrote: Am 07.01.2011 22:52, schrieb Hans Hagen: On 7-1-2011 7:04, Achim Jander wrote: \startxmlsetups xml:title \startchapter[ \xmlcommand{#1}{.}{xml:splitHeader} title=... Thanks. So it seems not to be possible, to have the whatever= part inside an xmlcomma

Re: [NTG-context] Fwd: Re: xml-processing: missing or ungrouped '='

2011-01-08 Thread Achim Jander
Hi Hans, sorry, i'll try to make it more clear: \startbuffer[test] some text more text more text 333some text more text more text \stopbuffer \startxmlsetups xml:testsetups \xmlsetsetup{\xmldocument}{a|b|title}{xml:*} \xmlsetsetup{\xmldocument}{num}{-} \stopxmlsetups \xmlregisters

Re: [NTG-context] Fwd: Re: xml-processing: missing or ungrouped '='

2011-01-08 Thread Thomas A. Schmitz
On Jan 8, 2011, at 1:39 PM, Achim Jander wrote: > Hi Hans, > sorry, i'll try to make it more clear: Excuse me, your example makes my head spin. Just from looking at it, there appears to be a fundamental error: you flush the content of into a context \startchapter \stopchapter environment, AFA

Re: [NTG-context] Fwd: Re: xml-processing: missing or ungrouped '='

2011-01-08 Thread Achim Jander
Hi Thomas, yes, of course you are right, but thats not making the problems. Its switched in while making a "minimal" example. My problem or maxbe misunderstanding ist what I try to achieve with \xmldoifelse{#1}{/num}{ownnumber=\xmlcommand{#1}{/num}{xml:ueberForceFlush}}{number=no} or in a m

Re: [NTG-context] Fwd: Re: xml-processing: missing or ungrouped '='

2011-01-08 Thread Thomas A. Schmitz
On Jan 8, 2011, at 3:23 PM, Achim Jander wrote: > Hi Thomas, > yes, of course you are right, but thats not making the problems. Its switched > in while making a "minimal" example. > My problem or maxbe misunderstanding ist what I try to achieve with Sorry, but I still don't have the faintest id

Re: [NTG-context] Fwd: Re: xml-processing: missing or ungrouped '='

2011-01-09 Thread Achim Jander
Hi Thomas, sorry, I dont want to bother you. But in fact that is not what I'm looking for. Maybe its my fault that I mixed a - as I thougt - related problem in my second mail. What I try to do is reduce redundancy. I cannot see where my explanations differ. In fact, I started with something lik