Thursday, November 24, 2005 Hans Hagen wrote:
> Giuseppe Bilotta wrote:
>>Thursday, November 24, 2005 Hans Hagen wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>this is a variant of taco's posted solution:
>>>
>>>
>>
>>[snip]
>>
>>
>>
>>>so, this way you can hook in a command that is executed after the symbol
>>>plac
Giuseppe Bilotta wrote:
Thursday, November 24, 2005 Hans Hagen wrote:
this is a variant of taco's posted solution:
[snip]
so, this way you can hook in a command that is executed after the symbol
placement
I like it! (Ok, I won't use it this time because in the mean
time I
Thursday, November 24, 2005 Hans Hagen wrote:
> this is a variant of taco's posted solution:
[snip]
> so, this way you can hook in a command that is executed after the symbol
> placement
I like it! (Ok, I won't use it this time because in the mean
time I reworked the text to use \head, with the
Giuseppe Bilotta wrote:
Thursday, November 24, 2005 Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Giuseppe Bilotta wrote:
However, I find it really 'funny' that there are n different
methods to create items in an enumeration ... should these
be rather enumeration options, so that you can use the same
source
Giuseppe Bilotta wrote:
This is why I was thinking of using \head, still, for
example.
but \head does not take an argument; it just treats the first paragraph
as special
Hans
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/ma
Thursday, November 24, 2005 Taco Hoekwater wrote:
> Giuseppe Bilotta wrote:
>> However, I find it really 'funny' that there are n different
>> methods to create items in an enumeration ... should these
>> be rather enumeration options, so that you can use the same
>> source code and just chang the
Thursday, November 24, 2005 Hans Hagen wrote:
> Giuseppe Bilotta wrote:
>>>(PS. I cannot send mail to your address, it bounces, do you have an
>>>alternative one?)
>>>
>>>
>>
>>Hm, which address is bouncing? bigfoot is long dead, use
>>the one I'm sending this from.
>>
>>
>>
> I get:
> Whe
Giuseppe Bilotta wrote:
However, I find it really 'funny' that there are n different
methods to create items in an enumeration ... should these
be rather enumeration options, so that you can use the same
source code and just chang the stuff in \setup/\staritemize
to achieve the different effects?
Thursday, November 24, 2005 Taco Hoekwater wrote:
> Hans Hagen wrote:
>> Giuseppe Bilotta wrote:
>>
>>> Yes, that's a good start :) however, I would leave the
>>> option to have both the symbol and the text, exactly as if
>>> it was run-in \head (i.e. with the actual item test
>>> following the \
Hans Hagen wrote:
Giuseppe Bilotta wrote:
Yes, that's a good start :) however, I would leave the
option to have both the symbol and the text, exactly as if
it was run-in \head (i.e. with the actual item test
following the \head text on the same line). However, you ma
want to have this as an opt
Giuseppe Bilotta wrote:
(PS. I cannot send mail to your address, it bounces, do you have an
alternative one?)
Hm, which address is bouncing? bigfoot is long dead, use
the one I'm sending this from.
I get:
When trying to deliver your message, the mail server at controller-1 encounter
Giuseppe Bilotta wrote:
Yes, that's a good start :) however, I would leave the
option to have both the symbol and the text, exactly as if
it was run-in \head (i.e. with the actual item test
following the \head text on the same line). However, you ma
want to have this as an option to \head ... ma
Thursday, November 24, 2005 Hans Hagen wrote:
> Hi,
> Something like this?
Yes, that's a good start :) however, I would leave the
option to have both the symbol and the text, exactly as if
it was run-in \head (i.e. with the actual item test
following the \head text on the same line). However, yo
Hi,
Something like this?
(PS. I cannot send mail to your address, it bounces, do you have an
alternative one?)
Hans
\unprotect
\def\v!txt{txt}
\appendtoks \letvalue\v!txt \itemgrouptext \to \itemgroupcommands
\setfalse\txtlistitem
\def\itemgrouptext#1%
{\def\symsymbol{\doitemattribute
Wednesday, November 23, 2005 Giuseppe Bilotta wrote:
> Wednesday, November 23, 2005 Hans Hagen wrote:
>> you want more space for the sym?
>> \startitemize[5*broad]
>> \item {word}
>> \item {another}
>> \stopitemize
>> (if needed, you can define an itemgroup with a default wider left m
Wednesday, November 23, 2005 Hans Hagen wrote:
> Giuseppe Bilotta wrote:
>>Hello,
>>
>>does ConTeXt have something which is halfway between
>>itemizations and descriptions? I have a small set of
>>properties that should be enumerated together. Right now I'm
>>doing it by defining a \description a
Giuseppe Bilotta wrote:
Hello,
does ConTeXt have something which is halfway between
itemizations and descriptions? I have a small set of
properties that should be enumerated together. Right now I'm
doing it by defining a \description and then doing
\desc{something} stuff \par
\desc{something e
Hello,
does ConTeXt have something which is halfway between
itemizations and descriptions? I have a small set of
properties that should be enumerated together. Right now I'm
doing it by defining a \description and then doing
\desc{something} stuff \par
\desc{something else} other stuff \par
etc
18 matches
Mail list logo
