bb wrote:
It would be a very good thing if stock texlive could reside in texmf
and texmf-dist while your complex setup and bleeding edge stuff could
reside in texmf-var, texmf-local, texmf-fonts, texmf-extras, etc. I
can guess at several reasons why this might not be feasible. But it
would be a wor
I think I have things working with texlive. I will reproduce the
installation to make sure I capture all steps. It basically comes down
to:
1) Install texlive 2004 to /usr/local/TeX
2) (possibly optional) Compile new pdftex, pdfetex and pdfxtex and
replace executable and pool files in /usr/local/
bb wrote:
Reading my own words I see how they don't exactly convey warm
appreciation for all the hard work that has been put into context.
That's ok, i have written stuff in the not so distant past that
was much, much less appreciative. :-)
below. Since texlive 2005 is in the process of being worke
On 5/9/05, Taco Hoekwater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> bb wrote:
> >
> > I think it would be a very useful exercise for hh
> > to install a complete texlive on a stock fedora box.
>
> I'm sure he would be happy to, if you provided the box and some
> funding (!).
Reading my own words I see how the
On Sunday 08 May 2005 08:44 pm, Hans Hagen wrote:
>
> wget www.pragma-ade.com/context/install/linuxtex.zip
> unzip linuxtex.zip
> cd tex
> . setuptex
> texexec --make --all
>
> after that, for each shell:
>
> . ~/tex/setuptex ~/tex
>
> (given tat you're in your home path)
Following the above as a
bb wrote:
I think it would be a very useful exercise for hh
to install a complete texlive on a stock fedora box.
I'm sure he would be happy to, if you provided the box and some
funding (!).
Most developers that work on free software miss at least
one of the following:
* spare hardware
* spare d
> The upgrading of Context or even of pdftex is sufficiently
> failure prone that I have given up trying.
I tend to agree. I follow the meager instructions I have found, as
well as some direct help from hh himself and am still not able to get
it working right. I think the problem is with hacked en
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To upgrade I have downloaded
http://www.pragma-ade.com/context/current/cont-tmf.zip
and read also part of
http://www.pragma-ade.com/general/manuals/minstall.pdf
wget www.pragma-ade.com/context/install/linuxtex.zip
unzip linuxtex.zip
cd tex
. setuptex
texexec --make --all
a
John R. Culleton wrote:
On Saturday 07 May 2005 06:01 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello !
I tried to install a new version of context, since somebody suggest to
do it (BTW I do not know how know what version of context I have
... running texexec --version gives me the version of texexec, I
presume
I finally succeed installing this new version ... at least
s-pre-61.tex compiles ;-)
--
Oli
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
On Saturday 07 May 2005 06:01 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello !
>
> I tried to install a new version of context, since somebody suggest to
> do it (BTW I do not know how know what version of context I have
> ... running texexec --version gives me the version of texexec, I
> presume, not the ve
Hello !
I tried to install a new version of context, since somebody suggest to
do it (BTW I do not know how know what version of context I have
... running texexec --version gives me the version of texexec, I
presume, not the version of context ... but anyway ... that not my
sole problem, as for
12 matches
Mail list logo
