Re: [NTG-context] Install Problems with 64 bit ARM Linux

2020-12-01 Thread Christian Prim
Hi Mojca thanks a lot! Because glibc is backward compatible one can only deliver the 2.28 binaries (they work on a 2.29-system) ... so not several versions needed. Christian Am Di., 1. Dez. 2020 um 16:20 Uhr schrieb Hans Hagen : > On 12/1/2020 4:05 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > > Dear Christian,

Re: [NTG-context] Install Problems with 64 bit ARM Linux

2020-12-01 Thread Hans Hagen
On 12/1/2020 4:05 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote: Dear Christian, I remembered that I have an old Pine64 with Armbian 10 collecting dust somewhere in a drawer. I powered it up and it still works :) I guess we could build the binaries there. So then we have, like with bsd, several versions? Bah, happy

Re: [NTG-context] Install Problems with 64 bit ARM Linux

2020-12-01 Thread Mojca Miklavec
Dear Christian, I remembered that I have an old Pine64 with Armbian 10 collecting dust somewhere in a drawer. I powered it up and it still works :) I guess we could build the binaries there. Mojca ___ If your

Re: [NTG-context] Install Problems with 64 bit ARM Linux

2020-11-28 Thread Hans Hagen
On 11/28/2020 11:32 AM, luigi scarso wrote: On Sat, Nov 28, 2020 at 11:18 AM Hans Hagen > wrote: looks nice (specs and such) indeed, maybe as a next tablet (i haven't tested tex on the very old nexus in a while); probably a little faster than the rpi 4

Re: [NTG-context] Install Problems with 64 bit ARM Linux

2020-11-28 Thread luigi scarso
On Sat, Nov 28, 2020 at 11:18 AM Hans Hagen wrote: > looks nice (specs and such) indeed, maybe as a next tablet (i haven't > tested tex on the very old nexus in a while); probably a little faster > than the rpi 4 > these also look interesting e.g.

Re: [NTG-context] Install Problems with 64 bit ARM Linux

2020-11-28 Thread Christian Prim
Hi Hans > > (btw, i think a 32 bit arm bij should run on the 64 right, and the 32 > bit is still old debian) Could be, but one has to install the 32-bit linker and libraries. It doesn't work out of the box. I tested it. And the binary is not recognised as such: user@penguin:~/test/bin$

Re: [NTG-context] Install Problems with 64 bit ARM Linux

2020-11-28 Thread Hans Hagen
On 11/28/2020 11:02 AM, Christian Prim wrote: Hi Mojca sorry for being a few days late. I got the hardware just yesterday. It's a lenovo chromebook duet (Tablet), that can run linux apps. For the UK (you may select your country) it's here:

Re: [NTG-context] Install Problems with 64 bit ARM Linux

2020-11-28 Thread Hans Hagen
On 11/28/2020 10:52 AM, Mojca Miklavec wrote: Dear Christian, On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 at 20:50, Christian Prim wrote: Is there a reason why the arm binaries for ARM Linux use version 2.29 of glibc? They are being compiled on a Raspberry PI which kind of lacks first-class 64-bit support (or at

Re: [NTG-context] Install Problems with 64 bit ARM Linux

2020-11-28 Thread Christian Prim
Hi Mojca sorry for being a few days late. I got the hardware just yesterday. It's a lenovo chromebook duet (Tablet), that can run linux apps. For the UK (you may select your country) it's here: https://www.lenovo.com/gb/en/laptops/lenovo/student-chromebooks/Lenovo-CT-X636/p/ZZICZCTCT1X Very nice

Re: [NTG-context] Install Problems with 64 bit ARM Linux

2020-11-28 Thread Mojca Miklavec
Dear Christian, On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 at 20:50, Christian Prim wrote: > > Is there a reason why the arm binaries for ARM Linux use version 2.29 of > glibc? They are being compiled on a Raspberry PI which kind of lacks first-class 64-bit support (or at least that was the case when we set up a

Re: [NTG-context] Install Problems with 64 bit ARM Linux

2020-11-28 Thread Christian Prim
Hi could solve the problem, by installing the glibc from debian testing following the instructions found here: https://github.com/deltachat/deltachat-desktop/issues/1006 It would still be better I think when glibc 2.28 was used in the binaries... Thanks Christian Am Fr., 27. Nov. 2020 um 20:49

[NTG-context] Install Problems with 64 bit ARM Linux

2020-11-27 Thread Christian Prim
Hi everyone Is there a reason why the arm binaries for ARM Linux use version 2.29 of glibc? My actual debian buster installation is still on glibc-2.28. The x86_64 Linux binaries also use the older 2.28-version which is widely used among many distros. I would be very happy if I could install a