Re: [NTG-context] Integral limits

2013-11-18 Thread Hans Hagen
On 11/18/2013 11:45 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote: 2. Define a new mathclass "intop" and use that in char-def.lua. Then, in the appropriate math-*.lua file, map intop to the appropriate macro. What would be the best way to go? i prefer 2 (as these set the defaults) and we can make a definer for spe

Re: [NTG-context] Integral limits

2013-11-18 Thread Aditya Mahajan
2. Define a new mathclass "intop" and use that in char-def.lua. Then, in the appropriate math-*.lua file, map intop to the appropriate macro. What would be the best way to go? i prefer 2 (as these set the defaults) and we can make a definer for specific variants if needed (at all) Great. i

Re: [NTG-context] Integral limits

2013-11-18 Thread Hans Hagen
On 11/18/2013 9:41 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote: Hi, In MkII, it was possible to change the limits on integrals using \setupmathematics[integral=...] % limits, nolimits, displaylimits that would affect how \int, \iint, \iiint, \oint, etc behaved. I can see two ways of definining a similar fea

[NTG-context] Integral limits

2013-11-18 Thread Aditya Mahajan
Hi, In MkII, it was possible to change the limits on integrals using \setupmathematics[integral=...] % limits, nolimits, displaylimits that would affect how \int, \iint, \iiint, \oint, etc behaved. I can see two ways of definining a similar feature in MkIV. 1. Define \intop, \iintop, etc i

Re: [NTG-context] Integral limits on wrong place

2011-11-23 Thread Hans Hagen
On 23-11-2011 17:21, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote: On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 7:38 PM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote: Dear list, in the latest minimals (downloaded today 15 nov 2011) I get the integral limits placed below and above the integral sign, per default. %%% Example %\setupmathematics[integral

Re: [NTG-context] Integral limits on wrong place

2011-11-23 Thread Mikael P. Sundqvist
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 7:38 PM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote: > Dear list, > > in the latest minimals (downloaded today 15 nov 2011) I get the > integral limits placed below and above the integral sign, per default. > > %%% Example > %\setupmathematics[integral=nolimits] > \starttext > $\int_a^b f(x

[NTG-context] Integral limits on wrong place

2011-11-15 Thread Mikael P. Sundqvist
Dear list, in the latest minimals (downloaded today 15 nov 2011) I get the integral limits placed below and above the integral sign, per default. %%% Example %\setupmathematics[integral=nolimits] \starttext $\int_a^b f(x)\, dx$ \startformula \int_a^b f(x)\, dx. \stopformula \stoptext %%% End of e