Re: [NTG-context] Kerning and Minion Pro

2009-01-18 Thread Hans Hagen
Andreas Harder wrote: >> I've a curious problem: With Palatino or Latin Modern kerning seems to >> work as intended, but what's the matter with Minion (example below)? > This appears to be caused by the fact that in MinionPro most > (not all, but most) of the kerning is specified via kern c

Re: [NTG-context] Kerning and Minion Pro

2009-01-17 Thread Taco Hoekwater
Andreas Harder wrote: >> I've a curious problem: With Palatino or Latin Modern kerning seems to >> work as intended, but what's the matter with Minion (example below)? > This appears to be caused by the fact that in MinionPro most > (not all, but most) of the kerning is specified via kern cl

Re: [NTG-context] Kerning and Minion Pro

2009-01-17 Thread Andreas Harder
>> I've a curious problem: With Palatino or Latin Modern kerning seems to >> work as intended, but what's the matter with Minion (example below)? > This appears to be caused by the fact that in MinionPro most > (not all, but most) of the kerning is specified via kern classes. Than you for expl

Re: [NTG-context] Kerning and Minion Pro

2009-01-17 Thread Taco Hoekwater
Andreas Harder wrote: Hello, I've a curious problem: With Palatino or Latin Modern kerning seems to work as intended, but what's the matter with Minion (example below)? This appears to be caused by the fact that in MinionPro most (not all, but most) of the kerning is specified via kern classe

[NTG-context] Kerning and Minion Pro

2009-01-16 Thread Andreas Harder
Hello, I've a curious problem: With Palatino or Latin Modern kerning seems to work as intended, but what's the matter with Minion (example below)? \setupcolors[state=start] % \mainlanguage[de] \definefontfeature[basekerned][default][mode=base] \definefontfeature[nodekerned][default][mode=nod