[NTG-context] Leopard and ConTeXt

2008-04-09 Thread Steffen Wolfrum
Hi MacUsers out there, until yesterday I worked with 10.4 and a recent context: no problem (only mkII). Today I finally set up a new machine with 10.5. and MacTeX, run ctxtools --updatecontext. Running a context-file now gives me the right context-version but ends up with: "TeX capacity ex

Re: [NTG-context] Leopard and ConTeXt

2008-04-09 Thread Arthur Reutenauer
> Well, I remember this was something about texmf.cnf (or context.cnf?). The problem is usually that texmf.cnf is not found at all, so changes you make there will have no influence. What does kpsewhich texmf.cnf return? Arthur ___

Re: [NTG-context] Leopard and ConTeXt

2008-04-09 Thread Thomas A. Schmitz
On Apr 9, 2008, at 6:44 PM, Steffen Wolfrum wrote: > Hi MacUsers out there, > > > until yesterday I worked with 10.4 and a recent context: no problem > (only mkII). > Today I finally set up a new machine with 10.5. and MacTeX, run > ctxtools --updatecontext. > Running a context-file now gives me t

Re: [NTG-context] Leopard and ConTeXt

2008-04-09 Thread Steffen Wolfrum
Am 09.04.2008 um 18:52 schrieb Arthur Reutenauer: >> Well, I remember this was something about texmf.cnf (or >> context.cnf?). > > The problem is usually that texmf.cnf is not found at all, so changes > you make there will have no influence. What does kpsewhich texmf.cnf > return? /usr/local

Re: [NTG-context] Leopard and ConTeXt

2008-04-09 Thread Arthur Reutenauer
> /usr/local/texlive/2007/texmf/web2c/texmf.cnf > > ... but this isn't the right one, right? I suppose not (it's not the file you modified, right?). But then, as Thomas said, there's probably something special in your ConTeXt file (I always had save_size = 5000 and never had any problem with i

Re: [NTG-context] Leopard and ConTeXt

2008-04-09 Thread Steffen Wolfrum
Am 09.04.2008 um 20:41 schrieb Arthur Reutenauer: >> /usr/local/texlive/2007/texmf/web2c/texmf.cnf >> >> ... but this isn't the right one, right? > > I suppose not (it's not the file you modified, right?). But then, as > Thomas said, there's probably something special in your ConTeXt file > (