Khaled Hosny wrote:
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 01:32:28PM +0200, Vyatcheslav Yatskovsky wrote:
Hello
I wanted to manually push the changes, but the windows binary is at
0.44 already.
Thanks, Mojca, it is 0.44 already indeed!
Now we can use SyncTex option by adding \synctex=1 to the preamble.
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 01:32:28PM +0200, Vyatcheslav Yatskovsky wrote:
> Hello
>> I wanted to manually push the changes, but the windows binary is at
>> 0.44 already.
>>
> Thanks, Mojca, it is 0.44 already indeed!
>
> Now we can use SyncTex option by adding \synctex=1 to the preamble.
SyncTeX
Hello
I wanted to manually push the changes, but the windows binary is at
0.44 already.
Thanks, Mojca, it is 0.44 already indeed!
Now we can use SyncTex option by adding \synctex=1 to the preamble.
Regards,
Vyatcheslav
___
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 18:35, Vyatcheslav Yatskovsky wrote:
>
> The binary in minimals is NOT already at 0.44 (as I checked today). Looking
> forward to have 0.44 version because I want to try synctex support.
I wanted to manually push the changes, but the windows binary is at
0.44 already.
I'm
Hi Mojca,
I wasn't asking about testing Windows binaries
I know, I'm was joking :)
though it could be that the binary in minimals is already at 0.44 (if not yet,
then it
will be very soon or I can force an update; the w32tex page is already
updated).
The binary in minimals is NOT already a
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 15:46, Vyatcheslav Yatskovsky wrote:
> Hi Mojca,
>
> I'm willing to test luatex 0.44 binary on Windows ;) It has SyncTex support.
I wasn't asking about testing Windows binaries, though it could be
that the binary in minimals is already at 0.44 (if not yet, then it
will be v
Hi Mojca,
I'm willing to test luatex 0.44 binary on Windows ;) It has SyncTex support.
Regards,
Vyatcheslav
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-co
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 10:35, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 00:42, Michael Green wrote:
>> On Oct 28, 2009, at 3:04 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
>>
>>> Is there any Mac Tiger volunteer willing to test if binaries compiled
>>> on Snow Leopard work on Tiger? (No binaries are in minima
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 00:42, Michael Green wrote:
> On Oct 28, 2009, at 3:04 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
>
>> Is there any Mac Tiger volunteer willing to test if binaries compiled
>> on Snow Leopard work on Tiger? (No binaries are in minimals yet; I
>> need some volunteer to test first.)
>
> I'm wi
